Dear Santosh,

Thanks for your following email. Good to know that you are a neuroscientist and also noted that all others are well educated
people.

I have attached my report on cell tower radiation, which was submitted
to Secretary, DOT in Dec. 2010, it contained nearly 200 scientific and
technical papers.

I have also attached Bio-Initiative Report conclusions and RF color
chart, which gives details of various health hazards. You can download
complete Bio-Initiative Report 2012 (1479 pages long) from
http://www.bioinitiative.org/
The report gives references of 3800 scientific and technical papers
with a summary spread over several chapters.

Regarding my daughter's company "NESA Radiation Solutions Pvt. Ltd.",
it is known to cell operators and DOT officials since its inception
in Nov. 2011. Please see my report of Dec. 2010 and also in all my
presentations, I always emphasize that better radiation norms should
be adopted and transmitted power should be reduced. If transmitted power is reduced then who needs shielding solutions?

With regards.

**********************************************************************
     Girish Kumar
     Professor, Electrical Engineering Department
     I.I.T. Bombay, Powai, Mumbai - 400076, INDIA
     Tel. - (022) 2576 7436, Fax  - (022) 2572 3707
     email- [email protected], [email protected]
     Blog - http://profgirishkumar.blogspot.in/
**********************************************************************


On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Santosh Helekar wrote:

Dear Prof. Kumar,

Can you please refer me to any peer-reviewed research paper(s) in a
reputed scientific journal that substantiate(s) your claims about effects
of low power microwave radiation, and the physical and biological mechanisms
involved. As a neuroscientist, I have scoured through the medical and
biological literature and consulted with a world-renowned neuroscientist
who served on a U.S. National Institutes of Health committee to examine
this question in the 1990s. Neither he, nor the committee, nor I have found
anything that unequivocally supports your claims.

Cheers,

Santosh



On Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:50 AM, Prof. Girish Kumar <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Dear Gerard Delaney,

I do not know who are you and why you wrote the followings, which
were forwarded to me by Stephen Dias. Atleast you should try to find out
the truth and then make statements. You do not realize that how many
people, birds, animals, plants, trees, etc. are getting affected by
high cell tower radiation.

There are ample examples in the history that whenever anyone or group
of people raise voice against strong industry lobby, whose business
may get affected due to proper awareness, they decline, for example,
cigarette industry.

Cell operators and their associates came out with a book mobile phones..
myths and reality. Please see my comments on the book in the attached file.

Please see Pages 3 to 5 about sun (light) versus microwave radiation.
Also, see my disclosure on Page 9. This was released to the press in the last week of Jan. 2014.

If you have any questions, please send an email.

With regards.

**********************************************************************
      Girish Kumar
      Professor, Electrical Engineering Department
      I.I.T. Bombay, Powai, Mumbai - 400076, INDIA
      Tel. - (022) 2576 7436, Fax  - (022) 2572 3707
      email- [email protected], [email protected]
      Blog - http://profgirishkumar.blogspot.in/
**********************************************************************


On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Stephen Dias wrote:

 Dear Prof Girish,
 In case you wish to reply these funny uneducated guys , their e-mail
 is as follows:

 < [email protected]> and (2) is < [email protected]>
 Please send me a copy if you want to explain them about radiation
 power and principles etc Leave apart the business what he claims that
 your daughter is doing, that is not my interest.

 Stephen Dias
 date: 13.3.2014
 ================================================

 <Message: 7
 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Santosh Helekar <[email protected]>
 To: "Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994!"
        <[email protected]>
 Subject: Re: [Goanet] Misinformation of the radiation from mobile
        towers
 Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Thanks Gerard for sharing this information. It is important to counter
 these bogus scares that crop up from time to time by educating people
 about basic scientific concepts. Underlying these scares there
 invariably is some commercial scam or MLM-type fraud being
 perpetrated.?

 Cheers,

 Santosh


On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:56 PM, Gerard Delaney
<[email protected]> wrote:
 Last year, a small group of Saliganvkars created awareness in the
 Lourdes Convent school hall about the alleged dangers of the radiation
 from Mobile towers by showing a PP presentation of the so called expert
 Prof. Girish Kumar. The same presentation was used again for a much
 bigger group of villagers in Gladstone Ribeiro Sa's house and as a
 result the construction of the mobile tower by Dmello Telepower Pvt Ltd
 in Saligao was forced to stop.
When 6 of the leaders had met in my (Gerard Delaney's) house after
the
 Lourdes convent program, I had clearly explained to them how this Prof.
 Girish Kumar was using his position to create fear in the minds of the
public about the radiation and thereby helping his daughter's
business
 of selling meters to measure radiation and shields for it. I had even
 explained that the average frequency of light is one million times
 greater than that of microwave radiation. Hence according to the well
 established laws of Physics, light has energy greater than that of
 microwave radiation by one million. Thus it is ridiculous to be afraid
 of microwave radiation and not of visible light radiation which is one
 million times stronger! *However, what transcribed during the meeting,
was never released to the general public by the leaders of the
agitation.*
 Now a special panel of 13 members set up by the DoT in keeping with the
 Allahabad High Court's orders, has exposed the misdeeds of the
 Professor? and affirmed that there is no danger to the health from the
 radiations emitted by mobile towers. Read about this at:

 *Deccan Herald dated 25**^th **of February 2014*


http://www.deccanherald.com/content/388471/radiation-fears-mobile-towers-unfounded.html

 /Rejecting the contention of electrical engineering professor Girish
 Kumar, the 13-member panel said Kumar repeatedly red-flagged these
 concern in the media because of his family's commercial interest in
 companies involved in manufacturing radiation-shielding products.
Kumar's daughter Neha Kumar sells radiation-shielding products
through
 her company NESA Radiation Solutions Pvt Ltd. //
 ///
 **

 *The Indian Express; Feb 25 2014*

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/iit-prof-hyped-cell-radiation-daughter-sold-protective-shields/

/A committee set up by the department of telecommunications has raised
a
red flag over the ethical conduct of an IIT-Bombay professor for
blowing
 out of proportion the effects of mobile phone tower radiation on humans
and on the other hand promoting his family's business of products
that
 claim to reduce the impact of such radiation.
 /

 /"The committee observed that his daughter, Neha Kumar, is selling
 radiation shielding solutions through her company NESA Radiation
 Solutions Private Ltd. On one hand, he is spreading misinformation and
 creating misconceptions and unfounded apprehensions in the mind of the
 public by sensationalizing and blowing out of proportion the effects of
 EMF radiation, and on the other hand, he is promoting his family's
 business in related products (which do not even follow any national or
 international standards), thus throwing professional ethics to the
 winds," the report said.
 /

 ./..so long as EMF radiation power levels in the vicinity of base
 stations of cell phone towers are below the prescribed limits, there
should not be any cause of concern for adverse thermal health effects
on
human beings living close them," the committee said in its
report./


 *__*




Reply via email to