Dear Augusto,

The point I made is loud and clear in what I wrote.
That the author used personal anecdotes to good effect.
Have you read the book?

I am not aware that the author (Teotonio R. de Souza)
suffers from a “proclivity for toadying up to the Saraswats,
the Catholic ones at any rate". There is no hint of any such
proclivity in the book under review.

Are you, Augusto, by any chance, the butt of that anecdote?

Best, v


From: augusto pinto [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 05 October, 2014 7:58 PM
To: goanet; Valmiki Faleiro
Subject: Subject: [Goanet] Goa Outgrowing Postcolonialism: a review

Valmiki Faleiro writes: "(Teotonio De Souza)  uses personal anecdotes to good 
effect, as at pgs.132-133:

        *On a personal note, if [laureate Umberto] Eco had a motive for
        creating his blind librarian and naming him Jorge from Burgos, I too
        may have one for discovering a Goan avatar of [Edgar Allan] Poe’s
        hero in my native village of Moira. In a bid to make a mark as
fiction
        writer, he dabbles in the pre-historic glories of the mahars,
claiming
        that they have fallen from grace due to victimization by Saraswats!
        He may run for shelter if I choose to reveal that one of my first
        cousins, a Saraswat, was married in Church to a woman from Moira
        adopted by a mahar family. He may persist in his obsession, like
        someone who insisted in convincing me that Jesus was a Brahmin,
        because his cousin, John the Baptist lived on honey and low castes
        (read locusts).*

I don't appreciate the point that Valmiki seems to be making. Does he agree 
with  TS that merely because his cousin marries the adopted daughter of a 
Mahar, TS gets absolved of his proclivity for toadying up to the Saraswats, the 
Catholic ones at any rate? If this is what he thinks is " the Teotonio 
trademark of trustworthiness" I'm not impressed.

During his recent visit to Goa at a meet organized by Goa Book Club I 
questioned TS as to the reason for his bias and he came up with the lame excuse 
that there were no sources and that I should take up the job of writing the 
history of the Mahars. I retorted that I was a mere storyteller and not a 
historian, and that historians seem to choose methodologies which suit their 
biases.

Incidentally, TS is quite the typical Moidekar Bamon ganvkar: this breed is 
notorious for taking potshots at people without having the courage to name 
names.

Augusto

Reply via email to