From: [email protected]
To:
http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31804&articlexml=SWAMINOMICS-The-Dadri-effect-Killing-beef-eaters-will-11102015023017
Oct 11 2015 : The Times of India (Mumbai)SWAMINOMICS - The Dadri effect:
Killing beef-eaters will not win electionsSWAMINATHAN S ANKLESARIA
AIYARPredicting elections is a mug's game. Nonetheless, I predict that the
BJP will lose in Bihar.
Killing beef-eaters does not win elections.
Journalists have long accused the BJP of trying to win Bihar by stoking
communal passions with stunts like throwing calf heads or meat near
temples.This is not conclusively proven. But BJP governments in many states
have banned meat and beef sales, imposing stringent controls on cattle movement
that strangle the cattle and leather trade, and make the possession or eating
of beef very risky. The BJP views this as a vote-winner.
The clincher is the refusal of BJP leaders to condemn outright the lynching by
a Hindu mob of a Muslim in Dadri for supposedly eating beef -which is entirely
legal. BJP apologists have performed verbal acrobatics to somehow avoid
condemning this murder. This terrifies Muslims and millions of Hindus (notably
Dalits and tribals) who have long eaten beef.
Apart from being morally outrageous, this is also poor politics. On Thursday
Modi finally broke his silence on Dadri, saying people should follow President
Pranab Mukherjee's call for tolerance and unity, ignoring all other voices
(including BJP voices). Yet that very day, his colleagues in Kashmir beat up a
Muslim politician holding a beef party. Modi's ploy seemed to evade the beef
thuggery question via insincere homilies. He wants to appear non-communal
without categorically condemning his colleagues or the Dadri murder. This will
not wash.
Some analysts call this a turning point. Many who gave Modi the benefit of
doubt on social harmony are now outright critics. Modi came to power on a
platform of development, not Hindutva (despite his RSS background). His appeal
to the aspirational classes for better livelihoods and governance struck a
chord with voters, and won him the general election.
Instead of sticking to that platform, Modi has shifted to communal
polarization. No longer does he follow the policy of `sabka saath, sabka
vikas'.Muslims, dalits, tribals and beef-eating Hindus have been dumped from
his `sabka saath' agenda.He thinks that this loss of support will be made good
by anti-cow-slaughter fanatics. But the fanatics were always with him. He won
last time only by attracting others in the political centre.If he now loses the
centrists, and banks on extremists alone, he will surely suffer.
The Dadri murder is not just a moral but economic issue. Fear of RSS goons has
forced many shopkeepers to stop selling even buffalo meat.Transporters of
cattle are fearful of arrest and worse. India has a huge leather and footwear
industry employing millions of workers (including many Dalits). All these now
face shortages of hides and rising prices that make them uncompetitive in
exports. Farmers have always sold aged cows, oxen and buffalos to abattoirs.
Indeed, this has enabled India to become the biggest beef exporter in the
world. Suddenly this large industry, a major employer, has become very risky ,
and may become extinct in some states. The price of aged cattle has crashed or
gone to zero, diminishing the wealth of millions of cattle owners. In states
like Bihar, most farmers own oxen for ploughing and transport, apart from cows
for milk. All of them face wealth erosion. So, Modi's promise to increase jobs
and income is turning sour.
BJP theorists will claim that the cultural popularity and mobilizing power of
the anti-cow-slaughter movement will eclipse any economic side effects. I
disagree, but let us wait and see. Even if the economic side-effects cost Modi
no more than 2-3% of the vote, that could be electorally lethal.Many Indian
elections are lost on thinner margins.
Besides, the beef incident will surely intensify “strategic voting“ against the
BJP . Muslims and others opposed to Modi will vote not for their favorite
candidate, but for the candidate in their constituency most likely to beat the
BJP. The NitishLalu alliance has always looked very opportunistic and unlikely
to stick, given that the two sides have castigated one another for a decade.
Some Nitish supporters might prefer the BJP to Lalu. Yet the advantage the BJP
hoped to gain from this will be diminished by the communal polarization (and
hence strategic voting) it has now created.
In every recent state election, the BJP has won fewer votes than in the general
election. In 2014, the BJP and allies won 38% of the Bihar vote.They need to
take it to at least 43% to win what is mostly a straight fight. So, they need
to woo a big chunk of additional voters in the centre. Killing beef-eaters will
not accomplish that. Nor will their vague echoing of Pranab Mukherjee's line
atone for the Dadri murder.
My Times, My Voice: Like this article?
SMS MTMVSA Yes or No to 58888.
Charges applicable. Rs 3 per sms
