From: b sabha <[email protected]>

http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31821&articlexml=BY-INVITATION-Weve-got-to-fight-for-our-13032016014013
BY INVITATION - We've got to fight, for our right to information 
<http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31821&articlexml=BY-INVITATION-Weve-got-to-fight-for-our-13032016014013>
epaperbeta.timesofindia.com
The Times Of India daily ePaper - Watch digital ePaper of India from around the 
world.



Mar 13 2016 : Mirror (Mumbai)
BY INVITATION - We've got to fight, for our right to information
SHAILESH GANDHI




An act that has empowered millions is slowly being leached of its force majeure
In the last week of April 2005, as news headlines were dominated by citizens 
agitating against police con stable Sunil More, infamous for the Marine Drive 
rape case, there was a small inside page report about a police inspector 
Prakash Aware who had raped a minor in September 2004.The medical report and 
evidence were conclusive and Prakash Aware was suspended from service. In 
December 2004, the case came up in court and he was acquitted. By March 2005, 
his suspension was revoked, and he was back in service. Agitated by this 
report, I decided to act.

Under the Maharashtra act, I sent an RTI application to the Public Information 
Officer (PIO) of the Police Commissioner on May 2 2005 asking for a copy of the 
letter revoking his suspension.This information would reveal the name of the 
police officer responsible for revoking the suspension.They refused to give the 
information on frivolous grounds, and I filed an appeal. In August 2005, the 
police sent me a letter instead that they had dismissed police inspector 
Prakash Aware from service in July 2005! While the RTI isn't intended to 
address grievances, it can bring transparency and accountability into 
governance.

DEMOCRACY AT STAKE

The biggest strength of the RTI is that citizens use it, spread the good words 
and teach others how to use it. It becomes more powerful by the day, deepening 
our democracy. When a slum dweller -an RTI-empowered citizen -applied for a new 
ration card, he was told he would have to give a bribe of Rs 2,000 to officials 
to obtain it. Our friend smiled and just went ahead and applied. No bribes, no 
grovelling for pity. He had found out that all the bribegivers got their ration 
cards in about six weeks. He waited eight weeks, and then submitted an RTI 
asking up to which date applications for ration cards had been cleared, and the 
action taken on his. His tools were the simple RTI form and a fee of Rs 10. He 
then delivered this to the PIO of the Food and Supply office. The corrupt 
officials were shaken, since the information would reveal that they had given 
ration cards to others who had applied after him, and there was no 
justification for delaying his card. Net conclusion, he obtained his ration 
card immediately. This story repeats thousands and thousands of times, with 
different particulars. Citizens have gotten pensions, passports, tax refunds, 
electricity connections, birth certificates and so on.

Citizens had an active role in drafting the RTI act, rated among the top three 
in the world. The creation of an Information Commission, and the provision for 
a penalty of Rs 250 per day of delay on the responsible officer in case of 
delay or refusal without reasonable cause, have been the major reasons for its 
success. The law is simple and over-rides all earlier laws. No information can 
be denied by claiming confidentiality, aside from the 10 provisos under Section 
8 (1) of the RTI law.A nominal fee of Rs 10 for the application and Rs 2 per 
page for the information given, empowered the citizen. It is estimated that in 
the ten years of its existence, over 30 million applications have been made, 
and about six to eight million are likely to be made this year.

THE TRIPLE THREAT

But there are those who resent the changing paradigm of power, and there are 
three major ways that the RTI is being subverted.

First, the bureaucracy is developing techniques to wear out those seeking 
information that could expose arbitrariness and corruption. After getting 
power, people's mindsets undergo a transformation. It is a matter of deep 
distress that even the present CM of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal, who become 
nationally famous for his work on the RTI campaign, has not brought about any 
significant change in his government towards transparency. Even when 
Information Commissions give specific orders, governments defy them with 
arrogance. Currently, the Maharashtra Chief Secretary is defying the 
commission's order to appoint PIOs in the offices of ministers and provide 
information. Ministers are scared of being transparent about their actions, and 
are thus illegally defying a statutory order. This is lawlessness. The 
Maharashtra Commission has been delivering decisions at a comparatively fast 
pace but is handicapped by the fact that the State government has been very 
laggard in filling the vacancies.

Second, many information commissioners are selected as an act of political 
patronage, and many have no predilection for transparency. Even retired heads 
of the Intelligence Bureau, steeped in secrecy, are appointed heads of 
information commissions. The lack of effective working, accountability and 
transparency at most of the commissions is becoming a major obstacle. Many 
commissioners do not understand the law, nor the basic rationale for 
transparency or democracy. The commissions are becoming senior citizen's clubs. 
The lazy way in which many work has built up mounting pendency.

Third, the law mandates that the PIO must deliver information within 30 days or 
pay a penalty, but many commissions are taking over a year to give a 
decision.What moral authority can they then have to penalise a PIO for delay? 
Hence, the penalty provision is used stingily, as if it was the death penalty.

THE INTERNET IS THE SAFETY NET

The push for transparency is the failure of most governments to follow the 
mandate of the act and disclose most information which citizens want suo motu. 
This section also required all government work to be done on networked computer 
systems. If this was done, all paper files could be banished and at the end of 
each day all records -except what is exempt in the RTI Act -could be displayed 
on the internet. This would save crores in terms of cost of paper, files, 
printing inks, space for keeping the files, besides building transparency into 
the system by design. It would also result in all records becoming accessible 
easily. I had instituted a paperless electronic working as a Central 
Information Commissioner. This is a mandate and promise to the nation made in 
the RTI Act which has not been fulfilled. Even where citizens cannot access the 
net, PIOs would find it very easy to provide information.

Also public servants need to realise that they are public servants for only 
about 50 of the 168 hours in a week. Their stake in the nation as citizens is 
far greater.The simple talisman is greater transparency for our democracy.

Citizens should hasten this process toward greater adherence to the RTI Act by 
the public authorities. And public servants should look at this law from the 
perspective of working for a better nation with a government which citizens 
trust. That would be true nationalism.

Shailesh Gandhi is an RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner

[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/NasData//PUBLICATIONS/MIRROR/MUMBAI/2016/03/13/Photographs/014/13_03_2016_014_013_003.jpg]<http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31821&articlexml=BY-INVITATION-Weve-got-to-fight-for-our-13032016014013#>

[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/NasData//PUBLICATIONS/MIRROR/MUMBAI/2016/03/13/Photographs/014/13_03_2016_014_013_005.jpg]<http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31821&articlexml=BY-INVITATION-Weve-got-to-fight-for-our-13032016014013#>

Reply via email to