bharatmukti.blogspot.in/2016/07/vanxim-agreement-of-sale-of-1999-text.html
1. Agreement of Sale carried on 09.04.1999 between Fr. Victor Rodrigues and
Mahendra Gaunekar
2. Land composition in two clusters: 1,85,125 square meters and 3,00,225 square
meters. Total 4,85,350 square meters
3. Patriarch of East Endies Archbishop Raul Nicolau Gonsalves gave Power of
attorney on 30.06.1994 to Fr. Victor Rodrigues appointing him as attorney with
powers to enter into this agreement, to execute necessary deeds etc. Did
Archbishop Gaonsalves consult Vanxim people before authorising Fr. Victor
Rodrigues to sell Vanxim? If yes then why the records are not made public?
4. Rates fixed as Rs. 20/- and Rs. 6/- per square meters.
5. Gaunekar will be responsible to clear tenants from Paddy fields. If Gaunekar
fails then Church will not be responsible. Church is very clearly not in
defence of Vanxim People as per logic of this document.
6. Total amount to be paid to Church is Rs. 55,03,850/-
7. Advanced paid to the Church is Rs. 4,02,500/-
8. Fr, Victor Rodrigues has shown all the Vanxim documents to Gaunekar.
Gaunekar is satisfied that Vanxim land has good and markatable title. These
documents are not shown to the people of Vanxim. Why these documents are kept
secret? Who made Archbishop owner of Vanxim lands? So Vanxim was sold through
documents and not through power point presentations. Why People instead of
giving documents are shown power point presentations?
9. Gaunkear may nominate any individual, comapny, partnership to buy Vanxim.
Archbishop will oblige. So Church was aware of the corporate involvment yet
went ahead with Sale of Vanxim. Criminal activity, sinful activity of the
Office of the Archbishop.
10. Agreed to sell Vanxim land that is not registered in land registrar office
nor in revenue office bearing Old cadastral survey number 1 and has Mandovi
River as boundary on East, West, North and South. Does this means entire Island?
11. Expert view sggests that signature of the Church witness Ayres Sequiera is
forged in Agreement to Sale. His signature does not match with signature on
Sale deed. Criminal investigation needed against those responsible.
12. Mahendra Gaunekar's Panjim address kep hidden in document. It is simply
stated that Gaunkar hails from Panjim while Fr. Victor Ferrao has precise
address as Bisop's Palace, Altinho, Panjim. Why Gaunkar's address kept hidden?
Is it because he was staying very close to Bishop's Palace and conspiring? This
is repeated in Sale deed of 2006 as well. How did Goernment Authorities
registered Agreeemnt to Sale in Panjim Sub registrar without complete address
of Mahendra Gaunekar the Vendee? How many more this type of scams carried on in
Government offices?
13. Vanxim Agreement of Sale is suspicious due to above reason and needs public
debate.
