KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Represented by Nisha Kumari  & Paramjeet Singh-----  Customer Care, Executives

Permit me to summarise for your considerations
             Ref.  12038800001

The baggage with tag No KLO607082 was not forwarded to Lisbon on the  Flight  
KLO878 from Mumbai - Amsterdam- Lisbon on 10July 2018 2-.It took up to 6.45 pm 
of waiting and lodging the complaint after landing. 3- The pick up and transfer 
to hotel paying  been paid 100 Euros was missed  and hence additional fare of 
60 Euros was incurred. 4- The messenger waiting at the hotel  for  a planned   
meeting with a friend  between 5-6 pm left due to delay and I was unable to 
communicate. The presents for him remained in the bag undelivered. 5-  The 
missing report required to wait for 3-5 days and provide  details of all the 
contents in the bag The customer should have been provided information while 
applying for  luggage insurance.,6- The start of joyous holidays was ruined.  
We are senior citizens, pass 75 years and tensions aggravated medical 
condition. The supply of vital medicines. for 3 months was in the bag. 7-I had 
to purchase snickers(shoes) as  the tour involved walking on this pilgrimage . 
8 -The schedule did not permit shopping of this nature, the shops were closed 
at the end of days tour ,would have to  hire a special cab since only souvenirs 
were available at halts..The minimum essentials required due to uncertainty and 
5 days wait were purchased through tour guide like shoes, saving kit, with 
machine ,6 blades , lotion, tooth brush &  paste at 200 Euros, No receipts were 
kept as refund was not meditated..You could have  at least verified the minimum 
costs of these essentials in Lisbon before rejecting the claims as consequence 
of your negligence. 9 I did not make any specific claim, leaving to your just n 
 fair decision  nor did i  I complaint about the final decision. The mental 
agony, torture, cannot be computed in strict monetary terms Even the cost of 
phone from hotel cost 3,33 Euros to inquire several times
When the bag was delivered on 12 Aug, late at night, there was no explanation 
or apology note. On the contrary a message later asked us to rate your 
services,which was adding salt to wounds of torture and a cruel joke
10-The compensation of 100 Euros is not credited from 9 Aug and no explanation 
as to the delay  even in spite of several reminders . Why the baggage insurance 
suggested by you could not be invoked to grant relief  11-- The formalities of 
prominent airline were not streamlined calling back and forth responses and 
obliquely intended harassment. 12 After submitting details in the  format with 
bank account etc another message requested bills of expenditure and Indian 
account ,as no foreign exchange is payable, after knowing all fares were paid 
in foreign exchange only Why that information could not have been elicited 
right from the start 13  - Once  Nisha gave the decision, I supposed  it was 
final outcome 14.. Around 19 Aug. another Consumer Care Executive Mr. Paramjeet 
Singh denied the request quoting the limitations of 21 days without perusing 
the decision and correspondence had  started on 29July.  Mrs Nisha  never made 
an issue of the limitation period for claim. It is clear that there is no 
coordination and it is a deliberate attempt to delay, deny and  mode  at 
harassment. Mr Singh expected to ruin the remaining part of troubled tour 
further  suggesting to patronize their airline for satisfactory experience. Mrs 
Nisha in another message around 19 Aug offered 50 Euros in non refundable 
voucher to be en-cashed on future travel., without any reference to previous 
offer. Which customer would ever travel to buy a sandwich on a flight? Once 
again in Sept , I have received a whatstapp message to provide a fresh details 
of Bank Account..when it is already in their possession.

Just imagine the the volume of correspondence and time consumed from 29 July to 
date, Is there no period of limitation for the airline to act on a legitimate 
grievance without any specific demands? I am not asking for charity, alms or 
tips with  baggage insurance, I realised  later, The compulsory tips to bus 
driver and tour guide was 200 Euros.. Made  minimum essential purchases ,not 
luxuries as the wait period for bag was 3-5 days  and that too was  uncertain 
and tour movement every second day to a different location .Is this the reward 
for customer who consciously decided to travel by KLM for the first time,in 
relation to other options that were available? Mere repeated, standard format 
of apology  ad- nauseum is no balm to sooth mental agony , torture, anxiety, 
and winch was only after my request for consideration,and worry of  live saving 
medicines in the bag among other things. No message was received regarding the 
position of delayed baggage or the cause and action against the irresponsible, 
careless employee. On the contrary you have harassed the customer with 
contradictions from 2 Executives, change of decisions by same executive without 
explanation to override her own decision. I have not made bone of contention 
about your offer of 100 Euros indicating Indian equivalent to suggest as a 
windfall. Further  rejecting  baselessly   by another  by limitation period  
and then another  offer of 50 Euros voucher for in flight
It is not clear as to which of   your decision that stands as final

Please be informed that in case you renege on your decision, I am at a liberty 
to withdraw my good will gesture and to seek legal redress at 3 stages in 
consumer forum and take the matter up with IATA for contradictions, delay,  
cruel harassment to wear me  out to give up in frustration .That will not 
happen as my determination at all costs is firm.The avenue for wide publicity 
is also available to warn travelers and my 40 International colleagues eagerly 
waiting resolution's of my case.  This message will be posted verbatim. You  
have not responded to provide mob and postal address of KLM ,Mumbai  in India 
as a matter of courtesy and service to customer on specific request .Remember 
all the consequences are due to your gross negligence and liability under 
deficiency of service cannot be overlooked It would have been another matter, 
if my grievances were rejected without the voluminous back and forth 
correspondence and contradictory decisions without plausible explanation This 
is to be treated as a legal notice
Nelson Lopes
Customer of KLM
Sent from my iPhone

Reply via email to