Sabarimla the SC say The SC is the highest judicial body and its order need to be respected to uphold rule of law in the country. The state Govt in Kerela is duty bound to provide implementation in letter and spirit. The prevailing circumstances instigating the believers is counterproductive and defiance. But since major ruling party is tacitly supporting such defiance and violence has practical difficulties
The SC judgment in Rafael is for the national party concerned is gospel truth to ward of any questions, Can SC orders be quoted selectively as per convenience? The RAM bakhts are on record that if SC judgment goes against temple construction, they will nevertheless build it ,despite such adverse ruling Where is sanctity and obedience of rule of law? It is argued that SC has entertained religious disputes against tradition and custom. The provision of equality in the constitution has upheld the right of women to enter and pray against arbitrary restrictions on age In Mumbai the age old tradition of denying worship to Muslim women is struck down and is historic decision. Does it not apply to similar situations mutatis mutandi ? There are many other religious places in Kerela, Bihar , Maharashtra prohibiting entry of women, Why these places of worship not thrown open to women and where are the activist concentration on Sabarimala Another question agitating the activists is the ban on women priest in catholic religion, though some protestant denominations in England have brought about revolution in its thinking. We are living in a progressive world order, where revolutionary changes can be ushered in by non violence, discussions and debates Nelson Lopes Chinchinim
