Khan was a world class cricket player and captain. Many times taking decisions 
to win under pressure. The other chappy is a chai walla who has sent his bhaktsĀ 
 to threaten minorities in bharat. No support for the Ghodra mass murderer.
BC-
Regrettably the Pakistani PM has come out on top in the public relations and 
perception war between the two.

Here?s why:
Khan?s demeanour exhibits humility, a worried look and constant mouthing of 
requests for peace (mostly hypocritical no doubt).

Modi comes across as a braggart, war-mongering demagogue and revenge seeking 
leader with more intent to do harm than promote peace.

Khan?s statements are measured, planned and ready with proof of his armed 
forces actions. 

Modi just throws things in the air and when they fall to the ground his claims 
are exposed as lies and hollow boasts. 

Khan lulls the Indians with warnings like ?we will retaliate at a time of our 
place and choosing? and the very next day they send air strikes while the other 
side is still readying (dance like a butterfly and sting like a bee).

Modi and his cohorts are all talk and little action. Instead of a sizeable air 
strike-force intended for shock and awe, they send across their most outdated 
air armour and are dumbfounded when they are shot down (growl like a lion and 
bite like a goat).

Khan does a good job of making friends of former enemies (Russia) and better 
friends of current friends (China, Iran and Saudi Arabia).

Modi on the other hand has nothing to show for all his tours and bear hugs. He 
has alienated traditional ally Russia, played toady to the United States and 
breaks no new ground with China who is sure to dump Pakistan quickly if India 
makes meaningful long term gestures of friendship. It should choose to side 
with Iran more visibly and often since that Shia State is a natural ally.

I*******  

Reply via email to