Dear Dom, I find your post ridiculously reductionist and propagating the same stereotypes that we blame the outsider for. There are so many nuanced in-betweens that you conveniently ignore. I expect better from a thinker of your stature. Dramatic hollow soundbytes is not our way.
Cheers! Cecil ========== Message: 2 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 15:03:17 -0700 From: dom martin <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [Goanet] To who can I attribute this quote? Message-ID: <CAPvvpb=Axetgi9HTyBFCxK=6durr07rs2w6cxguh3dhvdf6...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" If the language and cynic-syntax resembles Margaret's style, then I am obviously in trouble -- in the thundering sense that some of my other posts may have similarly been auto-credited to her. (Note: Soundly clarifies why I continue to remain ?unsung?:). Otherwise, Cecil, it's my quote. And indeed, with your assistance, I'll be more inclined to stay put on my sinking paper-Mache pedestal if stones(or fators and fatoristas) are summoned for the proverbial stone casting finale! Dom Martin <<<<<<<<<<[Goanet] To who can I attribute this quote?
