Dec 26

Yesterday, the JWST finally took off from French Guiana and soared into
space. That's the James Webb Space Telescope, a spectacular piece of design
and engineering that will open our eyes to wonders of the universe that we
can only guess at today. It's a triumph of human ingenuity that, for me,
puts in the shade all the divisions and bigotry we're growing too
accustomed to here on planet Earth. I trust you feel the same!

But I'll say no more. My column on the JWST went up on Mint just over a
week ago. Check it out: There's a Webb to be weaved,
https://www.livemint.com/technology/gadgets/theres-a-webb-to-be-weaved-11639675103327.html

Write to me, sing to me if you like, of your own sense of wonder over Webb.

cheers,
dilip

PS:  "Weaved"? or "woven"?

---

There's a Webb to be weaved


Not long ago, the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) turned its gaze on an
explosion. Astronomers had witnessed the death of a star inside the
so-called Butterfly Galaxies in the constellation Virgo, about 60 million
light years away. At the end of their lives, stars explode, forming what's
known as a supernova. So as soon as this supernova (called SN 2020fqv) was
detected, a team of astronomers "triggered our ultra-rapid
target-of-opportunity program with HST to obtain very early-time"
observations of SN 2020fqv. ("Last Year Before Death: Observations of SN
2020fqv by TESS and Friends", Samaporn Tinyanont et al, TESS Science
Conference, 2-6 August 2021,
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021tsc2.confE.144T/abstract.)

The result was a ringside view - as much as being 60 million light years
away can be described as one - of the early moments after the star's death.
HST was on the job within hours of this one's death. This meant that the
telescope was able to examine what the star ejected in the last months of
its life. As you might imagine, that's not a frequent occurrence. While
stars are dying all the time, it's rare that we can actually see a
supernova. It's rarer still that we have a powerful telescope handy to
observe it.

But this is just what happened with SN 2020fqv and the HST. The result is
that we know more about the final moments of stars, maybe even enough to
detect signs that one is about to die and go supernova. In fact,
astronomers have taken to calling SN 2020fqv the "Rosetta Stone" of
supernovas. The original Rosetta Stone, remember, was what led to the
deciphering of Egyptian hieroglyphics in 1799. In the same way, SN 2020fqv
has taught us plenty that we didn't know about supernovas.

There's a lot more to tell in this story. But my point here is really about
the "final moments" of the HST. It has been a workhorse of astronomy for
three decades now. It shows no signs of letting up on that pace of
astronomical discoveries - this Rosetta Stone being just one example. But
its days as that workhorse of astronomy are now numbered.

Though it's not that the HST is about to explode, or even fall into disuse.
Not at all. But as I mentioned in my last column here, there's a new kid on
the block: the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will soar into space on
December 24.

The JWST will settle into an orbit that is about 1.6 million km beyond the
moon. This is a spot in space known as a Lagrange point. Where exactly it
is, is defined by the presence of the Earth and the Sun. It is that point
at which, for any object, the force required to keep it in orbit equals the
pull of gravity from the Earth and the Sun. Because of this, the object can
stay essentially in place without needing much fuel.

>From that vantage point, using its mirror that's three times larger than
the HST's, the JWST promises even greater astronomical triumphs than the
HST has brought us. Astronomers expect to use the JWST to learn more about
the universe as it was very soon after the Big Bang - a period of time that
we know about more via speculation and inference than via real data. How
will they do that? By observing extremely distant objects, so distant that
we see them now as they existed in those early years.

The HST showed us galaxies up to about 13 billion light years away, meaning
that light from there has taken that long to reach the HST, meaning in turn
that we are seeing them as they existed 13 billion years ago. The JWST will
take us even further back in time. It should be able to show us stars and
galaxies as they were actually forming in those infant first few hundred
million years of the universe's existence.

But with the JWST, astronomers also want to make progress towards answering
that ancient question - are we alone? This is because JWST will allow much
closer examinations than we have ever managed of exoplanets, planets that
orbit other stars. By now, we know of thousands of exoplanets. The
challenge is to examine each of them for signs of life, or signs that it
might support life. It's not so much that astronomers expect to discover
whether life does exist, or even could exist, outside our planet. Instead,
they are excited by the unexpected findings such a search will throw up.
The astronomer and SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) veteran
Jill Tarter spoke of this spirit in an interview with the Washington Post
some months ago. She hopes the JWST will "continue with [the] legacy" of
every other telescope humankind has ever built, in this sense: that it
"will show us something that none of us had in mind when the telescope was
proposed."

In a real sense, that's the great worth of the JWST.

Yet all that peering into the void, at distant planets, into the past, is
in the future. Not billions of years, but about six months. This is because
it will take that long for the JWST to settle into orbit and begin
operation. The HST was assembled by astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle. In
contrast, the JWST will assemble itself. Unfolding its huge mirror, firing
up its instruments, deploying a plastic "sunscreen" - all these manoeuvres
will happen automatically, certainly without any human helping hand. In the
whole months-long process, there are what scientists refer to as "single
points of failure" - specific operations that will doom the JWST if they
don't happen as planned. For if any of them fail, there's no way to send a
repair team out to set things right.

There are 344 such single points.

So you can imagine why scientists the world over are going be chewing their
fingernails over the next several months. Not that there hasn't been such
chewing over the last several years: the project has been through delays
and budget overruns, a certain pandemic and even a threat of cancellation.

Topping those for sheer drama, there was a particular worry prompted by
where it will be launched from. That's the European Space Agency's launch
facility in French Guiana. Now the JWST is too large to fit on a plane. So
it went to South America by ship, sailing through the Panama Canal. The
exact date of this trip was kept secret because of, yes, pirates. Modern
pirates who might salivate at the prospect of hijacking this incredibly
valuable piece of machinery. Starting with its gold-plated mirror and
moving on to its intricate, elaborate instrumentation, this is an object
worth over $10 billion. Unlikely, you might think, but what if there was a
gang of such pirates? Thus the simple precaution of keeping the journey
secret. There's too much riding on the JWST, and the $10 billion is,
arguably, the least of it.

Yet the stakes are enormous, and scientists all over the world are also
aware of that. At Yale University, the astrophysicist Priyamvada Natarajan
told the New York Times this week: "Remarkable enduring achievements of
human hand and mind, be it the temples of Mahabalipuram, the pyramids of
Giza, the Great Wall or the Sistine Chapel, have all taken time and
expense. I truly see JWST as one such monument of our times."


-- 
My book with Joy Ma: "The Deoliwallahs"
Twitter: @DeathEndsFun
Death Ends Fun: http://dcubed.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Dilip's essays" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dilips-essays+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dilips-essays/CAEiMe8oWds-dE5HQfdJozKR8COC0vevGN6aEJ1_%3Da8GGTu9OWg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to