Bhandare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you think that paying homage to innocent
> victims of terrorism is a insensitive thing? Whose
> sensitivity is at stake here?
Bhandare,
There is only one cure for terrorism. The cure is to
remove hatred. Having "Orange Marches" for one or one
hundred years does not remove hatred. It perpetuates
it.
> I would have agreed that only doing so without
> making an effort to apprehend the culprits would
> definitely be insensitive to the victims
You may be wrong. The US Govt rewarded the person, who
was asleep at the controls during 9/11, with a medal.
This is also the same guy who failed to find Osama. It
seems, to me, that a free Osama is more valuable to US
imperialism than a dead or captured one. I will agree,
however, that George Bush does give the impression
that he is trying to apprehend Osama. After all, he
has sent a lot of troops to Iraq.
That is sensitivity. A sensitivity that is spreading
across the world. A sensitivity that is also creating
another backlash......
Mervyn3.0
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
