Hi Bhandare, You are making a virtue of insulting people and then apologizing. Then promising not to do it again. Yet only to repeat it.
Are you saying that Letters-to-the-Editor are not selected for their contents in peer-reviewed in a journal? Did you read the entire short paper of mine (with references)? Instead of relying only on a small part that Santosh reproduced? If you did, you would have noticed the abundant data I quoted to make my several points. Like most letters-to-the-editor, the author is limited by length of the article and the references. To review a paper of a well renowned university professor in the USA is not easy and simple task. For the editor / editorial boards to accept the review for publication is commendable to the author. This is not writing a Goanet post. In fact the University Professor in his response, was very appreciative of my added material without being defensive? Are yo interested in highlighting the positives of what you see and read? Or you, like a few others, are only interested in criticizing and destroying others? Please take the initiative to write original articles of your own. In fact, I would appreciate if you and Santosh reposted the last post of yours on an original topic that you initiated. Please stop imitating others, in merely being an ankle-bitter. Should the moderators take some steps to uplift the tone of dialogue currently seen on Goanet? I hope this can be my last post on this thread. Kind Regards, GL -----------Bhandare Thanks to Santosh's diligence we now know that Dr Gilbert refers to a non peer reviewed letter as a "short paper"! he mhanje naaralala "shreephal" aani chaadrila "mahavastra" mhannya paiki aahe! ( credited to P L dehpande) Bhandare
