There are a few odd things about this latest incident.
1. The Indian Govt says that the views of the two party officials were not the 
views of the government. Funny that, given both were ruling party official 
spokespersons. One was a national spokeswoman and the other a Delhi regional 
spokesman.
2. The speed and alacrity with which the two offenders were disciplined. No 
such reaction was forthcoming when minority institutions were attacked, people 
killed by mobs and during the long drawn out suffering of Fr. Stan Swamy who 
ultimately died of harsh imprisonment and lack of medical care.
3. Modi’s ego and political strutting has burst like an overblown balloon with 
a pinprick from the Gulf Arabs.
4. There has been sharp criticism from the Hindutva ranks to the government’s 
quick backing down in the face of Muslim anger. Will this spell doom for the 
hitherto all-powerful Modi. Will Hindu extremism given birth by him now push 
him out?

From the CNN 
It took India less than 24 hours to discipline two politicians after a 
controversy that had been brewing at home for over a week caught the attention 
of its Arab trade partners.  
 
India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Sunday suspended a spokesperson 
and expelled another official after derogatory comments they made about Islam’s 
prophet led to an outcry in Arab countries.  
 
“India was taken aback by the response," said Kabeer Taneja, a fellow with the 
Observer Research Foundation, a think tank in New Delhi. “Communal issues are 
not new in India and in previous cases, we have not had such a response [from 
Arab states].”  
 
On May 26, BJP spokeswoman Nupur Sharma made comments on an Indian news channel 
about Prophet Mohammad that were deemed offensive and Islamophobic. Qatar, 
Kuwait and Iran summoned India’s ambassadors, and the Gulf Cooperation Council, 
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the Organization of Islamic 
Cooperation issued statements of condemnation.  
 
Sharma said on Twitter she had “said some things” in response to comments made 
about a Hindu god but it was “never my intention to hurt anyone's religious 
feelings.”  
 
Most Indian news outlets reporting on the story didn’t directly quote Sharma’s 
original comments.  
 
Naveen Jindal, a BJP leader, was expelled from the party over comments he made 
about Islam on social media, the BJP office said.  
 
Analysts said Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has walked a tight rope 
between keeping his Muslim international allies happy while pushing his party’s 
Hindu nationalist agenda at home.   
 
“Modi has tried very hard to prevent his party’s domestic political agenda from 
spilling over and poisoning India’s relations with the Gulf states,” said Hasan 
Alhasan, a Bahrain-based fellow at the International Institute for Strategic 
Studies who researches Indian foreign policy in the Gulf. “The extent to which 
Sharma’s comments have clouded India’s relations with the Gulf states is 
unprecedented, and that’s of course because she is, or was, the spokesperson of 
the BJP.”  
 
Taneja said the Indian government has realized that a lot of religious rhetoric 
“has been taking place for a while and has been going unnoticed, but it will 
not go so anymore.”  
 
The hashtag “Anyone but the prophet, oh Modi” was trending on Twitter in all 
six Gulf countries, and as far away as Algeria, with residents in Muslim 
nations calling for a boycott of Indian products. Oman’s outspoken Grand Mufti 
Sheikh Ahmad Al-Khalili, the chief religious figure in the country, called 
Sharma’s comments “a war on all Muslims” and a matter that "calls for all 
Muslims to rise as one nation.”  
 
Offending depictions of Islam’s prophet have in the past led to mass boycotts, 
diplomatic crises, riots and even terror attacks.   
 
The controversy comes as Gulf states and India look to significantly enhance 
their economic partnership. India, the world's third-biggest importer of oil, 
looks to the Middle East for 65% of its crude imports. On the other hand, the 
Asian nation sends millions of workers to the Gulf states who send home 
billions of dollars in remittances.   
 
“There are over 8 million non-resident Indians across the Gulf. The Gulf states 
are key sources of India’s oil and gas imports, and bilateral trade is over 
$100 billion,” said Alhasan. “So it is a very important set of relationships 
from the Indian perspective.”  
 
Abdulaziz Sager, chairman and founder of the Gulf Research Center in Jeddah, 
Saudi Arabia, said that nature of India-Saudi relations gives Riyadh political 
and economic leverage over the Indian government.    
 
“I don’t think that will have a jeopardizing effect in terms of the economic or 
political relations because India is still an important country,” said Sager. 
“It is an important relationship but Saudi Arabia is not going to accept any 
sort of insult to the Prophet or undermining of religious Islamic issues,” said 
Sager.    
There are more than 2.2 million Indians in Saudi Arabia, according to Indian 
officials.  
 
Taneja said India knows the clout Gulf states have over it because of the 
diaspora in those countries. “That is why we saw such a brisk response from the 
government."  
 
CNN’s Esha Mitra contributed to this report 

Roland.
Toronto.

Reply via email to