It’s like asking BRITAIN 🇬🇧 to return the KOHINOOR diamond 💎 ?

But uncertainty exists just who gets it back 
Since Punjab was partitioned in 1947 ?

> On 16 Jun 2023, at 02:20, Gilbert Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Well-articulated about the negatives of Colonialism.  Our book looks at the 
> negatives and positives of colonialism.  
> Of the about dozen aspects described in our book, the following may be an 
> overlooked system.
> 
> Creating and Maintaining an Expanded Caretaker System
> The village communities were cared for by a system of Proximal and External 
> caretakers.  The Proximal caretakers were parents and members of the extended 
> family, integral in Indian society. External caretakers were various Welfare 
> Agencies either private, religious or government operated, including the Azil 
> for the elderly and the terminally ill. Often the religious institutions, 
> priests and nuns straddled the internal and external caretaker role by being 
> an informal bridge to the various entities (including recalcitrant relative), 
> directly 
> providing some assistance; and setting a moral code of conduct and themselves 
> endowed by society with some moral authority.  
> 
> Historically prior to and during colonization, Goan villages can best be 
> described as a Static, Poverty-stricken, highly Stratified, Endogamous and 
> Rural Society. Associated features of the people are constancy in the face of 
> social and economic instability, an agrarian status and a somewhat feudal 
> structure where all live in a chronic state of poverty and deprivation as a 
> mix of nuclear and extended families.  Children were expected to work at less 
> than skilled jobs as soon as they were old enough. This is not peculiar to 
> Goa but is seen in most villages in Asia and Europe. They are often the 
> victim of Amoral Familism a construct described by Edward Banfield in ‘The 
> Moral Basis of a Backward Society.’ This explains the inability of villagers 
> to act together for the long-term common good over the short-term advantage 
> of the individual family. 
> 
> The greater challenge today is how such issues surface and handled in a 
> modern village or in the diaspora where in the past the once sheltered 
> society (assisted by State and Church) is no longer protected, and 
> individuals are no longer restricted and constrained by traditional norms, 
> practices and expectations.  In summary, traditional societies had been 
> protected by proximal and external caretakers as described, which today in 
> urban cites and in foreign countries is replaced by a multilayered 
> bureaucratic “Welfare Agency,” yet the (Goan) villages and individual cases 
> may be overlooked. 
> 
> Gilbert Lawrence,
> Co Author:  Insights into Colonial Goa
> Published by Amazon and Kindle
>  
> -----------------------------------
> 
> From: Nandini Sardesai 
> 
> very well-articulated!
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> So, what did the Portuguese loot? by Frederick Noronha
> 
> So, someone asked this question in cyberspace: "I genuinely wanted to learn 
> more about this.  I have watched a few videos on YouTube, but they are mostly 
> from people with agendas and don't make sense to me as they do not validate 
> their claims with facts.  What did the Portuguese loot?  How did they do it?"
> 
> These days, we are getting increasingly caught up in fighting battles over 
> the past.  Our economy, the difficulty for our youth to find jobs, and the 
> crony capitalism is only getting worse.  Together with this, the tendency to 
> blame the past for all our present-day ills is also getting more acute.
> 

Reply via email to