On 29/07/07, Victor Rangel-Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Alfred, > Although you seem to believe that Selma's > statement was made in jest, that is not how I read it. > It would seem to the casual reader that she was > passing on to us some information she herself had > learned, and the statement that followed did not > really establish that it was "utterly false". > That said, I believe the ongoing and never-ending > sparring between Selma and Cecil, and Cecil and Selma, > has now reached the point where we need to call a > truce; when one of them says something, the other > feels honour-bound to jump in and contradict what was > said. The back-and-forth has even degenerated to a > discussion of slipping undergarments. Before that > aspect gets any sillier, please stop! It no longer > matters who struck the first blow, or who would like > to strike the last; just stop, because, despite the > charges and countercharges, this is getting nowhere. > Regards to both combatants, and to everyone else > on Goanet, > Victor COMMENT: Quite honestly, I have long given up on trying to figure out whether it was just banter, trying to get one over the other or what !
I do agree that it is more than high time one of the combatants shows maturity; now who is it that is going to be the one to show it ?? Let us wait and see, who shoots off instantly to this post ? -- DEV BOREM KORUM. Gabe Menezes. London, England
