Date: 14th October 2007
   
  To
  The Editor
  GOANET
   
  Sir,
  I am forwarding a press note regarding a representation that GaunkarsFirst 
has before the Chairman, Goa State Finance Commission, Mr. Alban Couto, 
vis-a-vis Panchayats and their financing.
   
  If you require any clarification, I would be most happy to do so. 
   
  I hope you will give us due coverage in your esteemed web site.
   
  Thank You.
   
  Sincerely
   
  Sd/-
  Savio Herman D’Souza
  Convenor
  GaunkarsFirst
  Office: 0832-2416573
  Mobile: 9422063937
  __________________________________________
   
  FOR FAVOUR OF PUBLICATION
   
  In a six page representation placed before the H’ble Chairman of the Goa 
State Finance Commission, Mr. Alban Couto, on their views and suggestions which 
the Commission has sought from the public with regards to the financial 
resources and devolution of powers to Panchayats, GaunkarsFirst Convenor, Savio 
Herman D’Souza, has elaborately described how the “conquest of Goa” was not a 
conquest of her natives or the land and territory of Goa, but a conquest over 
foreign rule, which is the reason why Goans celebrate 19th December as 
“Liberation Day”.
  The representation states that the land of the 222 private Comunidade 
villages of Goa, which are governed by their very own laws based on customs and 
usages codified as Code of Comunidades is not the “property of His Majesty” or 
“property of the Portuguese Government” to be treated as “State Property”, a 
pre-requirement for the Government of India to become a “successor State” to 
the land, as stipulated under the Constitution of India.
  Hence, no State Government can impose any State-made bodies such as 
Panchayats and Municipalities, within the private Comunidade villages of Goa, 
or laws such as the GDDLRC Act, 1968, which is enacted in order to raise 
revenue in State property also known as “revenue villages”, when the Government 
establishes State Landlordism over a given land by executing State Land Tenure 
Contracts with the citizens living therein.  Such State Landlordism is totally 
absent in the private Comunidade villages of Goa, he pointed out. 
  He brought to the attention of the Commission that imposition of Panchayats 
in the private Comunidade villages of Goa is one of the many atrocities 
committed by the State against native Goans by falsely taking shelter under the 
color of the Constitution of India.  He further mentioned that by such 
fraudulent imposition of Panchayats in the Comunidade villages, the State 
Government is continuously committing atrocities, plunder of land resources, 
ethnocide, destroying and violating the fundamental rights of native Goans to 
their land, culture and economic resources, and goes against various 
International Treaties between the Natives and States as enshrined under the 
United Nations, of which India is also a member.
  Quoting Article 7 of the Draft United Nations Declaration of the Rights of 
Indigenous Peoples, which denounces ethnocide, cultural genocide and alienation 
of land of the natives by the State through administrative, legislative or 
other means, Mr. D’Souza appealed to the Chairman and The Goa State Finance 
Commission to restrict the Acts of the State within “villages in a State” also 
called “revenue villages” as foreseen under the Constitution, of which the 
private Comunidade villages do not form a part.
  The representation appealed to the Government to revoke the Panchayat bodies 
set up in the non-State private Comunidade villages of Goa, the Governmental 
and non-Governmental organizations to desist from abetting offences against 
native Goans, direct the Government not to venture into the private Comunidade 
villages which belong to the Gaunkars and not held by State grant and existed 
much before the State came into existence, halt the illegal collection of 
revenue in the private Comunidade villages, inform the Commission that the 
Panchayats and Municipalities have no authority to issue licenses, collect 
taxes or issue occupancy certificates and that the Government being the 
“Guardian” of the Gaunkars and native Goans cannot cause prejudice to the 
Comunidades and must honor the Treaty and Obligations it has inherited from the 
previous Ruler.
    The representation concluded by stating that it is not expected of a 
‘Welfare State’ to disrespect the existence of the age-old village communities 
of Goa or perpetrate atrocities against the Gaunkars and natives of Goa by 
violating their native laws, Constitutional laws and International Treaties and 
Agreements which makes the Government of India appear as another “colonist” 
ruling over the Gaunkars and natives of Goa.

                 sd/-
  Savio Herman D’Souza
  CONVENOR

   

       
---------------------------------
 Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how.

Reply via email to