No-trust
motions in VPs hindering development 


NT Staff Reporter


Panaji, Oct 27 Increasing numbers of no-confidence motions in the
village panchayats of Goa are proving to be a
hindrance to development in these villages, panchayat authorities feel.


Happening that is too within just five months of the panchayat
elections, this instability will have an adverse impact on the development of
villages, authorities say.


The director of panchayats, Mr Menino D’Souza agrees that the
increasing number of no-confidence motions are “not a healthy trend”. But he
said that in a democracy, the majority has to rule. He feels that sometimes
there are agreements between panchayat members to rotate the chair of sarpanch
between them after fixed intervals. But when the sarpanch refuses to hand over
power, the others move a motion of no confidence against him. If that motion is
somehow defeated, then by law, no other motion of no confidence can be brought
against the sarpanch for the next six months. This is done to bring about some
stability for at least for six months. But the downside of this is that if that
sarpanch loses the confidence of the majority again after a few days, he cannot
be removed for the next six months. Since he does not have the majority, no
resolution will be passed for six months and no development will be done, said
Mr D’Souza.


He agrees there are too many no-confidence motions and most of the
BDO’s time is eaten up in these. He also agrees that these motions block
development work. But he said it is good the gram sabhas have been revived
where people ask questions and the sarpanch’s chair has become a hot seat.


The Tiswaddi block development officer, Mr Vishant Gaunekar feels
that members bring about no-confidence motions mostly due to personal interest
or due to political affiliations. It is not because of major policy decision
failures. Anyway, it is to the detriment of the all.


He explains. Whenever a resolution for a development work is
passed in the panchayat and forwarded to the BDO, he deputes his engineer to
inspect the site. The engineer also discusses the matter with the panch
members, takes the measurements, prepares estimate and sends the file to the
PWD. By the time it comes back with approval, invariably two months have
passed. The approved file is then sent back to the panchayat. The panchayat has
to now advertise in newspapers inviting tenders. If the sarpanch changes by
then, the new sarpanch may not go ahead with the file. He sends some new
resolutions pertaining to some different development wards which he is
interested in. And the whole process starts all over again. All the groundwork
done on the earlier file goes in vain, said Mr Gaunekar.


That personal interest is the prime reason for no-confidence
motions seems to get credence from the speech of Ms Helena Lourenco, former
sarpanch of St Cruz village panchayat who was voted out of office on October 1,
2007. According to the minutes of the special meeting held on the October 1,
2007, “she stated that one of the reasons for this no-confidence motion is her
refusal to issue occupancy certificate in the above matters. She further stated
that village panchayat members had requested her to go on leave which proposal
was rejected by her.’’


She also complained that “norms, rules and regulations for
construction projects are violated, open spaces, setbacks are not considered,
flats and shops are occupied by people before revised plans are issued by the
concerned departments. The occupancy certificate has been issued without
completing the structure and in cases where CRZ is concerned the members were
insisting me to issue house numbers to the huts….’’


How ugly no-confidence motions can now get, is amply demonstrated
in the October 1 incident at Calangute village panchayat where unidentified
goons attacked a panch member with knives just before the special meeting to
hear the motion of no confidence against the sarpanch. Charges and 
counter-charges
have flown from both factions since then and the battle has now shifted to the
High Court. Till then, development in Calangute takes a backseat.


http://www.navhindtimes.com/articles.php?Story_ID=10288


 


Sanny de Quepem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Reply via email to