Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:09:20 +0000 From: "Gabe Menezes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My 'opinion' on the subject was: What is already out in the open World Wide Forum; a subjective study of the Chinese situation. With female foeticide and the subsequent, imbalance and the problems thereby arising. Thus my criticising your simplistic approach to the issue. To put it bluntly, so that you can understand more fully, it is the opinion of the sages that be.
I repeat, I do not have an opinion, which you require on what should be done to avert this problem - unlike your statement that the Women will end in the driving seat, in India (inferred). Pigs will fly, before that happens. Just because you may be subject to what is dictated to you, doesn't mean the rest of us men are in the same dock ! We work on: give and take.....We give they take ! sometimes they give and we take ! For the status quo to change from men dictating and holding the upper hand, God will have to change women drastically - give them strong biceps to beat up ! > Mario responds: > I speculated on what the growing imbalance between men and women in India would lead to. You apparently quoted a subjective study of what some "sage" thinks is happening in China, a country with a different moral compass from India's after decades of mind-numbing communism. Your nutty "sage" thinks several men will share one woman and rapes will rise. This may or may not have any application to India, a higly spiritual country. > Quoting a subjective study from a different country that is not similar to India is just as "simplistic" as my speculation. > I have offered no opinion about what to do about the problem as you falsely allege. > I have no idea what the rest of your comments about giving and taking are all about, other than they sound like more opinions that you deny having. >
