I find laughable Eugene's claim: "The book perhaps tells how long Telo was sentenced. If not for Indian government's intervention, he would not have been back on Indian soil."
And can Eugene be sure of this? How can anyone be sure that Portugal would have not released Telo sooner or later? Eugene's claim is ridiculous. We all know that Portugal started changing its views regarding its overseas possessions as early as 1967 when it offered Macau back to China for the first time (and China declined the offer). We also know that in 1974, Portugal became a democratic country and offered independence to all its colonies. How can anyone at all claim that Telo would not have been back on Indian soil if not for India's intervention. Who is Eugene to know this for sure? God??? Ahahahahaha!!! LOL! Where are the facts in Eugene's claim????? Paulo -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugene Correia Sent: 21 June 2008 11:54 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18- Let the Revolution Begin Miguel, again you have missed the point. It was not me but JC who raised the issue obliquely and then I said that I know that Telo was charged with bigamy. The book perhaps tells how long Telo was sentenced. If not for Indian government's intervention, he would not have been back on Indian soil. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22/06/2008 07:52
