George wrote

"By his own admission Eugene had a drink at the ball and wrote his one-sided 
"piece"...."
---
Dear George, you mean to tell goanetters that I was drunk and then went home 
and wrote the piece. Was I drunk when we spoke at length? Did I appear drunk 
when I introduced you to Chrystal's father and he offered drinks? Ben pressed 
into my hand a coupon for drinks despite my protest, and I did not use it. 
Let me inform you that the drink the guy who was shouting offered was on my 
table till the end and I asked someone else to drink it. I wrote the first part 
the next evening.
I am disappointed in your writing. I did not think of replying to your first 
post where you said my "notes" were "vinegar posts". Now you proclaim to the 
world I was in a drunken state when I wrote.
I can see that Kevin has turned you into his lapdog and the good vet has 
castrated you of your brains. Just because the Goa Sudharop group became close 
to the "power couple" does not mean you blow their trumpets. 
As for Lisette's post, I have explained the drama regarding my 
pre-registration. She needs to re-read my "notes" again. Regarding "personal 
basis" she is again mistaken if she thinks I meant the Saldanhas. She could 
re-read my notes again. I meant her uncle Aloysius Vaz.
If she has no "knowledge" that I am journalist it is not my fault. If only she 
had asked some of her committee members, she would have known. 
As for the "lie" that I was sued, Zulema wrote to me saying that if I need 
clarification then I must send a request to her "legal team." A simple yes or 
no would have sufficed.

Eugene



      

Reply via email to