Using a selectively mutilated quote of what I (jc) had written i.e. [Check a: If s/he has the requisite knowledge of the field of medicine in which the miracle is said to have occurred. b: S/he has personally reviewed all the original details of the case. c: S/he is able to say with confidence that there is NO other explanation for the 'cure'.]
Fr Ivo said: JC has not paid attention to all these three points presented in the postings. All these three conditions have been fulfilled by the Medical Bureau of Lourdes. Dear Fr. Ivo, Please do not miraculously or otherwise, change my wine into water or my words into 'almost my words'. I had suggested that the "criteria" be fulfilled by anyone who wishes to counteract Santosh's position. The Medical Bureau of Lourdes has not counteracted Santosh's position. You have. It is therefore YOUR responsibility to fulfill those conditions. I understand that English is indeed a difficult language. Please take your time before responding. And IF you plan to respond, please do not respond to a point which has not been made. Only politicians are 'allowed' to do that. sincerely jc For Information: This is what jc had written: In conclusion, I'd say this: The avenue open to anyone who wishes to counteract Santosh's position is the following: Advise us that he/she a: has the requisite knowledge of the field of medicine in which the miracle is said to have occured b: has personally reviwed all the original details of the case. c: is able to say with confidence that there is NO other explanation for the 'cure'.
