Hi Hartman Six of my posts to Goanet and one to a private group including Frederick and Bosco, since Jan/Feb 2008, received nil responses with regard to my concern about the failure of moderation and excessive rejection of posts without explanation. Nor did the six make it on Goanet for serious lack of transparency. When others experienced the same and Santosh received "inappropriate" for his carefully crafted and polite petition to Goanet on behalf of several Goanetters, I felt that my Exocet was needed. But for this Exocet, you wouldn't have a clue about this little rumble. You would have been barred from hearing about it through active censorship on Goanet.
I suggest that the other issues you have in mind have much the same genesis as corrupt practices also lacking in transparency. Don't you think that Goanet, emanating from an intelligencia, should be an examplar of good practice and transparency for others to emulate? However, do let me know what other priorities there are that you have in mind. I will happily fight for them if I consider them worth fighting for but I hope you are not arguing for the local nationalism of 'Goa for the Goans' that does not have a cat in hell chance of success in this globalised society of ours. Regards Cornel --- On Mon, 29/9/08, Hartman de Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Hartman de Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Goanet] Open letter to Goanet and other Goan related websites... > > People, shouldn't we be getting exercised about larger > issues here and keep > our nit-picking under tighter control? > Regards, > Hartman de Souza
