Hi Gilbert Thank you for indicating that brief reasons for post rejections by Goanet moderators would be helpful when they are deemed "inappropriate". That is indeed all critics of Goanet moderation have been asking for since Jan/Feb 2008. I am glad you have noted this point and responded to it even if through satire!
Hopefully, at long last, the moderators will take note of your 'wisdom' below! Alternatively, they could have a rule saying that no reasons will be provided--then at least, posters would know where they stand and choose whether to contribute to Goanet or not. I for one was invited to join Goanet as a contributor and subsequently told more than once that I had much to offer by none other than Bosco and Frederick themselves. Perhaps Boso in particular can now expound on his current vacuous view that "hell hath no fury like a poster scorned". I emphasise that, I didn't barge into Goanet and at one point when I indicated withdrawal from Goanet over a fiasco from the Gulf, both Bosco and Frederick 'begged' me not to do so as it would not be in Goanet's interests to do so. Perhaps hell hath no fury like a moderator scorned and exposed so easily! Cornel --- On Sat, 4/10/08, Gilbert Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Gilbert Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To be helpful, here are a selection of explanations > that the moderators can automatically added to the > "inappropriate post" > > "confusing" > "substituting chutzpah with learning" > "You have not read or understood the post you are > responding to" > "more Xapottam than knowledge" > "same old ... same old" > "More wind than substance" > "The brow-beating in your post is a poor substitute > for reasoning"
