Note: The cumulative impact of mines in South Goa *By the Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi*
*October 6, 2008* Mining has historically played a pivotal part in Goa's economy. Mineral sector, specifically iron ore mining is significant foreign exchanger earner for the state. Mining is mostly concentrated in four talukas namely, Bicholim in North Goa district and Salcete, Sanguem and Quepem in South Goa district.[1]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftn1> Some 400 mining leases had been granted in Goa till 2002-03, covering approximately 30,325 ha -- this works out to almost eight per cent of the total area leased out for mining major minerals in the state.[2]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftn2> The number of mines in the state is increasing every year and especially during the last year (2007-08), it has shown significant growth. Since June 2007, as many as 120 mining project have been submitted with the ministry for clearance. Of these, the environment appraisal committee has recommended clearance for overwhelming 48 per cent of the projects (see Graph 1: *High rate of clearance*). The remaining 52 per cent of the projects are still pending with ministry. *None *of the mining projects, which came up before the environment appraisal committee, has been rejected so far. Some projects received specific attention such as Mahavir Mineral Bauxite Mine (as the lease area fell in CRZ) and Devapan Dongar Iron & Manganese mine (permission granted only for iron ore mine and not manganese ore mining because of its negative environmental impacts. Graph 1: High rate of clearance Very few project proponents were asked by the appraisal committee to prepare a new EIA based on comments made during the public hearing process and *re-submit *the EIA report for clearance. These projects include Casarman manganese ore mine, Molio Dongor manganese ore mine etc (see Annexure 1). However, such cases are extremely rare and very few. Even in these cases, the clearance has not been outrightly rejected but the project proponent has been asked to resubmit with fresh information. If the proponent is able to furnish these, the appraisal committee in all likely will give green signal to the project. Large number of mining projects up for clearance also means that large areas of fertile agricultural land will get diverted for mining. Since June 2007, the total numbers of mining projects, which have been submitted for clearance, cover a huge area of *9,404 ha*. This is only a year's data (June 2007 – August 2008). No data is available as to how much land was diverted for mining between 2002-03 and 2006-07. Adding this 9,404 ha to the total area already under mining in Goa (till 2002-03), it works out to be *10.5 per cent *of the state, highest in the country and much more than mineral rich states like Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand. The mining rich talukas of South Goa, Quepem, Sanguem and Canacona have high forest cover, with 26.3 per cent, 64.2 per cent and 53.3 per cent of forest cover respectively. All the proposed 120 mining projects are in these forest rich talukas and would involve diversion of forest area. Therefore, if these projects are cleared, it will significantly alter the forest cover in these talukas. Other than the forest, the proposed project also cover a lot of agricultural land and has been identified as one of the major cause of concern by the local community. According to a report, in Rivona panchayat in Sanguem Taluka, out of total village land of 1929 ha, 1510 ha is under 23 mining leases granted during colonial Portuguese regime that ended in 1961 but were continued by the free India state.[3]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftn3> On an average, mining operations generate large amount of waste – overburden, and soil. Around 2.5 to 3 tonnes of mining waste has to be excavated to produce one tonne of iron ore. If all the iron ore projects submitted for clearance since June 2007 are cleared, then on an average 55 million tones of waste will be generated every year (assuming an average generation of 2.75 tonnes of waste to extract 1 tonnes of iron ore). This is a huge quantity and would also require large amount of land for its disposal. In the state, which is already witnessing number of protests on account of mining waste destroying the agricultural field, these new projects could become bone of contention. Especially taking into account the hilly terrain of the proposed mines and high rainfall. Another major cause of public protests in Goa against mining projects has been the destruction of water resources. Rivers such as Zuari and Kushawati in South Goa are getting polluted on account of sediments flowing from mining projects. Most of the existing iron ore mines have already breached groundwater table. About 10 tonnes of water is pumped out for every tonne of iron ore mined.[4]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftn4>This is also leading to depletion of groundwater in the surrounding areas. Surface water from the rivers also seeps and flows into the mining pits, leading to drying of rivers downstream. Proposed 120 projects in such a scenario is only going to add to the water stress. Interestingly, apart from one or two big projects, rest all proposed projects are small mines with annual production in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 million tones of iron ore per annum. Though the EIAs of most of the mines are available but it will not take much time to find out that they are just copy-paste job with changes only in the names of project (refer: Annexure 2). Moreover, the EIA reports which came for analysis to Centre for Science and Environment does not have clear mine closure plan (refer: Annexure 2). If proper action is not taken by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, than surely these small projects will eat up the existing forest, destroy water resources and would leave behind nothing but carters filled with water. * * *Annexure 1: List of mining project (South Goa) discussed by Additional Expert Committee of Mining Project (June 2007- August 2008)* *S.No.* *Name of the project * *Location* *Area (Ha)* *Annual production* *Status* 1 Polo Dongor Iron Ore Mine of Shri Imran Khan village Curpem 58.27 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa; Manganese ore: 14000 tpa Recommended clearance (date: June 13, 2007) 2 Mandiencho Soddo Iron Ore Mine of M/s. Nalini Vinayak Naik Sangod Village, Taluka Sanguem 90.20 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended clearance (date: June 13, 2007) 3 Borga Iron Ore Mines-I & II of M/s Panduronga Timblo Industries Rivona village, Sanguem Taluka 160.698 Iron ore: 0.3 mtpa Recommended clearance (date: June 13, 2007) 4 Sen Denominacao Especial Paiem Iron Ore Mine Project of M/s Manuel Dacosta ore mine Data not available Data not available Recommended clearance (date: June 13, 2007) 5 Expansion of Godbaem Ou Guttiem Iron Ore Mine by M/s. Chandrakanta fonu Naik Data not available Data not available Recommended clearance (date: June 13, 2007) 6 Expansion of Macodia tolem Mamatembo Iron ore mine Village Netorlim, Sanguem Taluka 72.72 Iron ore: 0.373 mtpa Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 7 Nomoxitembo de Caurem Mine of M/s Baddrudin Hussainbhai Mavani Sanguem Taluka Data not available Data not available Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 8 Huldol Bimbol Iron Ore Mine of Shri Gangadhar Narsingdas Agrawal Village Shigao, Sanguem Taluka Data not available Iron ore: 0.6 mtpa Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 9 Copila Gaichem Paul Iron ore mine of Sociedade Timblo Irmaos Limitada Shigao Village, Sanguem Taluka 94.0 Data not available Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 10 Sulcornem Iron and manganese Ore Mine of Shri Prashant D. S. Naique village Sulcornem, Taluk Quepem 24.25 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 11 Chirabande Vall Ore mine Sanguem Taluk 81.90 Data not available Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 12 Oiterio Divodgal Iron Ore mine village Curdi, Sanguem Taluk 34.22 Data not available Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 13 Santonachi Upri Iron Ore mine village Dabal, Sanguem Taluk 98.30 Data not available Recommended clearance (July 20, 2007) 14 Marga fondcul Ou Chicolmolo mine Taluka Sanguem 80.60 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa Recommended clearance (August 16, 2007) 15 Mortegal Mordi iron ore mine of M/s Smt Berta De Rago E Fernandes village Uguem,Tehsil Sanguem 70.46 Data not available Recommended clearance (August 16, 2007) 16 Shigao Iron Ore Mine of Shri M/s Panduronga Timblo Industrias village Shigao, Sanguem Taluka 50.40 Data not available Recommended clearance (August 16, 2007) 17 Careacodli Upri Adamtembo-E- Sauripar Iron Ore Mine of M/s R.T. Deulkar Maulinguem Village, SanguemTaluka 87.218 Iron ore: 0.25 mtpa Recommended clearance (August 16, 2007) 18 Careamol Iron Ore of M/s Jaisinh Maganlal village Pirla,, Taluka- Quepem 98.76 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa Recommended clearance (August 16, 2007) 19 Tembeachem Dongor Iron and Manganese Ore Mine of Shri Dinar Tarcar villages Maina, Cavorem and Rivona, in Quepem and Sanguem Taluk 99.37 Iron ore: 0.3 mtpa Manganese ore: 500 tpa Recommended clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 20 Bondra Advona Iron Ore Mine of M/s Panduronga Timblo Industrias village Darbondora, in Sanguem Taluk 92.278 Data not available Recommended clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 21 Suctoli Iron Ore Mine of M/s Panduronga Timblo Industrias village Sangod, in Sanguem Taluka 99.606 Data not available Recommended clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 22 Saniem Sacroda Iron Ore Mine of M/s M.S. Talaulikar & Sons village Sacroda, in Sanguem Taluka 50.30 Data not available Recommended clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 23 Carpadegga Codli Iron Ore Mine of M/s XEC Cadar Xec Usman village Codli, in Sanguem Taluka 40.29 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 24 Caneli Dongor Iron Ore Mine of M/s Francis Miguel Mascarenhas village Vichundrem, in Sanguem taluk 82.60 Data not available Recommended clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 25 Sancordem Iron Ore Mine of M/s A.V.S. Velingkar village Aglote,Tehsil Sanguem 47.722 Data not available Recommended Clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 26 Bimbol Iron Ore Mine of M/s EMCO Goa Pvt. Ltd villages Mollem, Collem and Sigao, Tehsil Sanguem 146.04 Data not available Recommended Clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 27 Odomolla Iron Ore Mine of M/s SOVA village Sqangod, Tehsil Sanguem 85.72 Data not available Recommended Clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 28 Tudou Iron Ore Mine of M/s Chowgule & Co. Ltd. village Tudou, in Sanguem Taluk 171.86 Data not available Recommended Clearance 29 Canvorzoritembo Motatembo Bandoli Dongor Iron Ore of Shri Bhanudas B.S. Cossombo, villages Curpem and Vichundrem, in Sanguem Taluk 98.9684 Iron ore: 0.27 mtpa Recommended clearance (date: November 12, 2007) 30 Govya Moll Iron Ore Mine village Sulcorna, in Quepem taluk 54.41 Iron ore: 0.5mtpa Recommended clearance (date: November 12, 2007) 31 Hunantlo Dongar Manganese Mine of Shri A.X.P. Palondicar village Colomba, in Sanguem Taluk 44.6964 Manganese ore: 1800 tpa Recommended clearance (date: November 12, 2007 32 Bencremdando & Cadiabanda Voril Dongor Mine of Shri Crishna Mukund Camotim village Vichundrem, Netoril and Mangal, in Sanguem Taluk 58.64 Iron ore: 0.23 mtpa Recommended clearance (date: November 12, 2007 33 Colomba Iron Ore Mine of M/s V.S. Dempo & Co (P) Ltd. village Rivona, in Sanguem Taluk 98.46 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 34 Vichundrem Iron Ore of M/s V.S. Dempo & Co. (P) Ltd. village Vichundrem, in Sanguem Taluk 100.0 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 35 Surla-Sonshi Iron Ore Mine of M/s V.S. Dempo & Co (P) Ltd. village Surla, Sonshi, and Cudnem, in Bicholim Taluk 253.39 Iron ore: 1.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 36 Curpem Iron Ore Mine of M/s V.S. Dempo & Co (P) Ltd. village Curpem, in Sanguem & Quepem Taluk 148.6775 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa Recommended Clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 37 Kirlapale Iron Ore Mine of Smt. Ahiliabai Sardesai villages Cormonem & Bandoli, in Sanguem Taluk 82.50 Iron ore: 0.6 mtpa Recommended Clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 38 Culnavorli Sodo (Dudal) Iron Ore Mine of M/s V.S. Dempo & Co (P) Ltd. village Dudhal - Maulinguem, in Sanguem Taluk 38.85 Iron ore: 0.36 mtpa Recommended Clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 39 Mada Tembo E-Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd. village Bhati, in Sanguem Taluk 99.1452 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (January 16, 2008) 40 Zambu Soddo Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd. villages Bhati & Cumbari, in Sanguem Taluk 50.82 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (January 16, 2008) 41 Kariamol Chardimol Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd. village Bhati, in Sanguem Taluk 98.36 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (January 16, 2008) 42 Kariamola Khuntimol Tembo Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd. village Bhati, in Sanguem Taluk 98.70 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Recommended Clearance (January 16, 2008) 43 Corpadega Iron Ore Mine of M/s Ramacanta V.S. Velingkar village Dharbandora, in Sanguem Taluk 62.26 Iron ore: 0.4 mtpa Recommended clearance (January 16, 2008) 44 Godcavadea Javalachem Upor Talavane Iron Ore Mine of Dr. Prafula R Hede Village Collem, Taluka Sanguem 62.268 Data not available Recommended clearance (January 16, 2008) 45 Chormol Iron Ore Mine of Shri Babal Naik Tari village Bhati, in Sanguem Taluk 41.46 Iron ore: 0.3152 mtpa Recommended clearance (January 16, 2008) 46 Shakti Bauxite Mines Pravin Kumar Gausalia Villages Betul, Naqueri, Morpilla, Velim, Fatorpa in Salcete & Quepem Talukas 826.158 Bauxite: 1mtpa Recommended clearance (date: August 5, 2008) 47 Devapan Dongar Iron & Manganese mine Salim Shaikh Village Caurem in Quepem taluka 83 Iron ore: 0.3MTPA Recommended clearance; permission shall be granted only for iron ore mining (date: August 5, 2008) 48 Dudagal Culna (mussa) iron ore mine Noor Mohammed Sheikh Mussa Village Dudhal in Sanguem taluk 83.74 Iron ore: 0.3 MTPA Recommended clearance (Date: July 8, 2008) 49 Carcareatemb Bombod iron ore mine, Kunda RS gharse Village Tudou in Sanguem taluk 76.87 Iron ore: 0.8 MTPA Recommended clearance (Date: July 8, 2008) 50 Santona Tembo Vichundrem iron ore mine Nacul alias Gurudas Hiru Gauns Village Vinchundrem in Sanguem taluk 20 Iron: 0.1 MTPA, Manganese: 2000 TPA Recommended clearance 51 Ghatti-Mordi Salginim iron & manganese ore mine AH Jaffar & Sons village Salginim in Sanguem taluk 45.295 Manganese ore: 2000 tpa Recommended clearance 52 Barazan Group of iron ore mines M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Sanguem taluk Data not available Data not available Recommended clearance 53 Fanascatem iron ore mine M/s Panduronga Timblo industries Village Codli, Bandoli and Cormonem in Sanguem taluk 100 Ion ore: 0.3mtpa Recommended clearance 54 Moliatembo Naquerim Rivona iron ore mine Virginia Maria Simoes Village Rivona in Sanguem taluka 50.8 Iron ore: 0.4mtpa; Manganese Ore: 0.005 mtpa Recommended clearance 55 Zomblimolacho Soddo iron ore mine Sitakant M gharse Village Muguli & Costi in Sanguem taluk 90.5 Iron ore:0.25 mtpa Recommended clearance; separate application for grant of clearance of expansion of beneficiation plant 56 Godcavadea Javalachem Upor iron ore mine, Dr. Prafulla R hede Village Colem in Sanguem taluk Data not available Data not available Recommended clearance (Date: February 13, 2008) 57 Cuddegal Voril soddo iron ore mine, M/s Mineira Nacional Limitada Village Santona in Sanguem taluk 91.09 Data not available Recommended clearance (Date: February 13, 2008) 58 Ghatti Mordi Salginim Mine of M/s. A.H. Jaffar & Sons Village Salginim, Taluka Sanguem Data not available Data not available Deferred for consideration at later stage (date: June 13, 2007) 59 Zamblimolacho Soddo Iron Ore Mine of M/s. Shri Sitakant M Gharse Moguli and Costi Village, Saanguem Taluka 90.5000 Iron ore: 0.25 mtpa Proposal not to be considered unless proper pre-feasibility study report is submitted (date: June 13, 2007) 60 Fanascatem Iron Ore mine Sanguem Taluk 100.0 Iron ore: 0.3 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (July 20, 2007) 61 Carcariatemb Bombod Iron Ore Mine of M/s Raguvir Sinai Gharse villages Todou, Taluka Sanguem 76.87 Data not available Deferred due to non-submission of pre-feasibility report (July 20, 2007) 62 Santona Tembo Vichundrem Iron Ore Mine of Shri Nacul alias Gurudas Hiru Gauns villages Vichundrem, Sanguem Taluk 20.0 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Mn: 2000 tpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (July 20, 2007) 63 Chormol Iron Ore Mine of M/s.Babal Sanvalo Naik Tari village Bhati, in Sanguem Taluk 41.46 Iron ore: 0.164 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (July 20, 2007) 64 Chunimolo or Gotifonda Tembo Iron Ore Mine of Sh. Ajit V.M. Kadnekar village Colomba/Rivona, Taluk Sanguem 88.15 Iron ore: 0.5 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 65 Ganesgudi Dongor iron ore Mine village Netorlim, Sanguem Taluka 56.437 Iron ore : 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 66 Niulitembo Fatratembo Iron ore Mine of M/s Kantilal and Co. Pvt. Ltd. village Villiena, Taluk Sanguem 99.99 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 67 Dobacho Dongor Iron & Manganese Ore Mine of M/s Kantilal and Co. Pvt. Ltd.. village Netrolim, Taluk Sanguem 22.02 Iron ore: 0.086 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance(August 16, 2007) 68 Gottovo Dongor Iron & Manganese Ore Mine of M/s Kantilal and Co. Pvt. Ltd village Netrolim, Taluk Sanguem 44.075 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 69 Melca Dongor Iron & Manganese Ore Mine of M/s Kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd village Sacordem, Taluk Sanguem 73.80 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 70 Molha Advona Concramali Iron Ore Mine of M/s Kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd village Sacordem, Taluk Sanguem 85.29 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 71 Borgalle Iron Ore Mine Mine of M/s S. Marzook & Cadar Pvt. Ltd village Rivona Taluk Sanguem 87.853 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (August 16, 2007) 72 Mahavir Mineral Bauxite Mine of M/s Mahavir Mineral village Carbo-Du Rama, Nuem, Canaginium, Taluka Canacona 437.52 Bauxite: 0.5 mtpa Not cleared as a part of lease area falls in CRZ, which needs to be surrendered, after which the proposal can be resubmitted for clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 73 Expansion and renewal of Dudagal Culna Iron Ore Mine of M/s Mussa Xeque Usman village Dudal, in Sanguem Taluk 83.74 Iron ore: 0.3 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 74 Matheapane Satarcarachem Iron Ore Mine of M/s Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers (P) Ltd. village Maina, in Quepem Taluk 23.0 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 75 Joleracho Dongor (Maina) Iron Ore Mine of M/s Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers (P) Ltd. village Maina, in Quepem Taluk 61.354 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 76 Carcariatemb Bombod Iron Ore Mine of M/s Raghuvir Sinai Gharse village Todou, in Sanguem Taluk 76.87 Iron ore: 0.8 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: September 19, 2007) 77 Casarman Manganese Ore Mine of M/s Raghuvir Sinai Gharse, village Salgini, in Sanguem Taluk 32.245 Data not available Deferred at the request of the proponent for consideration later (date: October 11, 2007) 78 Iranqui Iron Ore Mine of M/s Sri Shantilal Khushaldas & Bros. Pvt. Ltd. village Potrem, in Sanguem Taluk 53.058 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Data inappropriate for impact on air quality; project deferred for reconsideration later (date: October 11, 2007) 79 Dudaliache Iron Ore Mine of M/s Salgaocar Mining Industries (P) Ltd. village Dudal, in Sanguem Taluk 90.5359 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: October 11, 2007) 80 Asni Dongor Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd. villages Curdi and Curpem, in Sanguem Taluk 43.625 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: October 11, 2007) 81 Paicatembo Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd., village Villiena, in Sanguem Taluk 72.2313 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: October 11, 2007) 82 Ubeafatricho Dongor Iron Ore Mine of M/s Tisa Moraes Mining Industries, village Pirla and Maina, in Quepem Taluk 63.828 Data not available TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: October 11, 2007) 83 Cajucodil Molla Iron Ore Mine of M/s S. Kantilal & Co. (P) Ltd. village Villiena, in Sanguem Taluk 32.0 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: October 11, 2007) 84 Gonoxirem (Verlem) Manganese Mine of M/s National Agency, village Verlem, in Sanguem Taluk 93.7587 Data not available Deferred as proponent did not attend the meeting (date: November 12, 2007 85 Degotimolo Pilagala Iron Ore Mine of Sri R.T. Deulkar villageDudal & Maulinguem 81.50 Iron ore: 0.3 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 86 Expansion of Huldol Dongor Bimbol Iron Ore Mine from 0.6 MTPA to 1.0 MTPA, of Shri Gangadhar Narasingdas Agrawal village Sigao, in Sanguem Taluk 97.505 Iron ore: 1mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 87 Ube Fatracodil Dongor Maina Iron Ore Mine of Shri Gangadhar Narasingdas Agrawal village Maina, in Quepem Taluk 55.785 Iron ore: 0.28mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 88 Sotiemol E Dongri Iron Ore Mine of Shri Gangadhar Narasingdas Agarwal village Maina, in Quepem Taluk 87.28 Iron ore: 0.36mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 89 Solla Collomba Iron Ore Mine of M/s Damodar Mangalji & Co. Ltd. village Colomba, in Sanguem Taluk 72.99 Iron ore: 0.4 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: December 12, 2007) 90 Madiancho Tembo Iron & Manganese ore mines Dayanand J Neugi Villages Caurem & Rivona in Quepem & Sanguem taluka 86.36 Iron ore: 0.5 MTPA; Manganese Ore:0.001 MTPA TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: August 5, 2008) 91 Chiunim Dongor Iron & Manganese ore mines Gajanan PN Cormoli Village Rivona in Sanguem taluka 79.935 Iron ore: 0.52 MTPA: Manganese Ore: 0.001mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: August 5-6, 2008) 92 Gorditembo Iron & Manganese ore mines Ignatius Pereira Village Netravali in Sanguem taluka 46.528 Iron ore: 0.1555 MTPA TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (date: August 5-6, 2008) 93 Sigao iron ore mine M/s VM Salgaokar & Bro. Pvt. Ltd. Village Sigao in Sanguem taluk 174.41 Iron ore: 1.3 MTPA TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: June 3, 2008) 94 Gonoxierm manganese ore mine M/s National Agency Village Verlem in Sanguem Taluk 93.7587 Manganese: 1000 TPA Advised proponent to prepare a fresh EIA and resubmit for clearance (Date: June 3, 2008) 95 Casarman manganese ore mine M/s Raghuvir Sinai Gharse village Salgini in Sanguem taluk 32.245 Manganese: 1000 TPA Advised proponent to prepare a fresh EIA and resubmit for clearance (Date: June 3, 2008) 96 Molio Dongor manganese ore mine M/s Raghuvir Sinai Gharse village Salgini in Sanguem taluk 43.5 Manganese: 1000 TPA Advised proponent to prepare a fresh EIA and resubmit for clearance (Date: June 3, 2008) 97 Kirnim Dongor - Salginim iron & manganese ore mine VD Chowgule Village Verlem in Sanguem Taluk 20.775 Manganese: 1200 TPA Advised proponent to prepare a fresh EIA and resubmit for clearance (Date: June 3, 2008) 98 Zambey Molla iron 7 manganese ore mines Late Roque santana Barneto Village Rivona in Sanguem taluka 49.12 Iron ore: 0.2 MTPA, Managnese : 1500 tonnes per annum TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: June 3, 2008) 99 Expansion of Codli iron ore mine M/s Sesa Goa Ltd. Village Codli in Sanguem taluk Data not available Iron ore: 7mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance; separate application for grant of clearance of expansion of beneficiation plant (Date: April 16,2008) 100 Ghatti-Mordi Salginim iron & manganese ore mine AH Jaffar & Sons village Salginim in Sanguem taluk 45.295 manganese ore : 2000 tpa Deferred clearance; proposal forwarded to sub-committee (Date: March 12, 2008) 101 Velipiares iron ore mine M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Bhati in Sanguem taluk 98.315 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa Forest clearance awaited; the 3 Kantilal group project clubbed and decision will be taken after report from sub-committee. (Date: March 12, 2008) 102 Khairade E Toleavoilli iron ore mine M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Bhati & Naiquinim in Sanguem taluk 46.98 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa 103 Gonsumbordi iron ore mine M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Bhati in Sanguem taluk 100 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa 104 Kasaraman Dongor manganese ore mine M/s Raghuvir Sinai Gharse Village Salgini in Sanguem taluk 32.245 Data not available Case deferred as proponent did not attend meeting (Date: March 12, 2008) 105 Molio Dongor manganese ore mine M/s Raghuvir Sinai Gharse Village Salgini in Sanguem taluk 43.5 Data not available Case deferred as proponent did not attend meeting (Date: March 12, 2008) 106 Chuninimola iron ore mine M/s Shantilal Khushaldas Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Village Rivona in Sanguem taluka 42.91 Iron ore: 0.2 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: March 12, 2008) 107 Margaticho Soddo Iron ore mine M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Colem in Sanguem taluk 100 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: March 12, 2008) 108 Goichem Molan iron ore mine M/s Shantilal Khushaldas Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Village Colomba in sanguem taluk 32.4315 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: March 12, 2008) 109 Patiafala iron & manganese ore mine Quexova Sinai cundo Village Colomba, Curdi and Curpem in sanguem taluk 97.535 Iron ore: 0.5 mtpa: Managnese ore: 2000 tpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: March 12, 2008) 110 Deogotimolavoril Dongor iron ore mine M/s Lithoferro Village Sangod in Sanguem taluk 84.37 Iron ore: 0.338 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: March 12, 2008) 111 Bible Petta Iron ore mine M/s Orient Goa Ltd. Village Neturlim in Sanguem taluk 58.35 Iron ore: 0.25 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: March 12, 2008) 112 Galiem Mola Ou calzarigogo iron & manganese ore mine M/s Mukhtar minerals pvt. Ltd. Village Colomba in sanguem taluk 68.75 Iron: 0.5 mtpa, Manganese ore: 500 tpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: February 13, 2008) 113 Manganese ore mine M/s Mukhtar minerals pvt. Ltd. Village Colomba in sanguem taluk 21.7 Manganese ore: 1000 tpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: February 13, 2008) 114 Gogol - E - Galil iron ore mine, M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Bati & Cumbari in Sanguem taluk 23.02 Iron ore: 0.1 MTPA Forest clearance awaited (Date: February 13, 2008) 115 Toliavoili Zamod iron ore mine, M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Viliena in sanguem taluk 94.9 Iron ore: 0.1 MTPA Forest clearance awaited (Date: February 13, 2008) 116 Bamana Utkode E Outrose iron ore mine M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Bati & Cumbari in Sanguem taluk 97.94 Iron ore: 0.1 MTPA Forest clearance awaited (Date: February 13, 2008) 117 Madanrica iron ore mine M/s S kantilal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Village Bati & Cumbari in Sanguem taluk 116.772 Iron ore: 0.1 MTPA The Sub-Committee shall assess the overall impacts of mining activities of all the twelve mines on the environment in its totality and suggest further course of action. (Date: February 13, 2008) 118 Thatetem Sodo iron ore mine Raghuvir R Paiguinkar Village dharbandora in Sanguem taluk 91 Iron ore: 0.5 mtpa TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for (Date: February 13, 2008) 119 Santona Tembo Vichundrem iron ore mine, Nacul alias Gurudas Hiru Gauns Village Vichundrem in Sanguem taluk 20 Iron ore: 0.1 mtpa; Manganese ore: 2000 tpa The Committee felt that the iron ore being very small deposit and the whole lease area being a part of state reserve forest, justification for the proposed project shall be sought from the proponent; the proposal will be reconsidered. (Date: February 13, 2008) 120 Sulcorna iron ore mine Antonio David Sousa Village Sulcorna in Quepem taluk 60.079 Iron ore: 0.2 MTPA TOR and issues raised during public hearing to be incorporated in the EIA before resubmission for clearance (Date: July 8, 2008) Source: Minutes available on Ministry of Environment and Forest's website. Total area for mining in South Goa sent for clearance: 9,404 ha Total area for mining in South Goa recommended for clearance: 4,150 ha Total proposal for mining projects sent for clearance: 120 Total proposal recommended for clearance: 58 *ANNEXURE 2: CRITIQUE OF SPECIFIC EIA REPORT* * * (1) EIA report of Jolreacho Dongor iron ore mine, Quepem, South Goa (2) EIA report of Matheapan E Sataracarachem iron ore mine, Quepem Taluka, South Goa (3) EIA report of Careamol iron ore mine, Quepem Taluka, South Goa (4) EIA report of Devapan Dongor Iron and Manganese Ore Mine, Quepem Taluka, South Goa (5) EIA report of Chuninimola Iron Ore Mine, Sanguem Taluka, South Goa *Critique* *(1) Analysis of EIA report of Jolreacho Dongor iron ore mine, Quepem, South Goa* The Shantilal Khushaldas & Bros. Pvt. Limited own the iron ore mine. It is a small mine with an area of 63.35 ha in the village Maina in Quepem taluka of South Goa. Some of the critical features of this mine are as follows: · *Impact on steel price:* The project seeks to use opportunity to export iron ore to countries like China, S. Korea and Japan as demand there has increased tremendously. As most of the iron ore is exported from Goa, this is having serious implications for the country's steel prices. · *Cumulative environmental impact:* Several mines in all directions surround the Jolreacho Dongor Mine. Therefore, the cumulative effect of the pollution load will be severe in the region. According to the report, the emission level in the nearby villages is below the standard norms. But there should be a cumulative environmental impact assessment of all the nearby mines in the region. · *Full of false statements:* According to locals, the report is full of false statements. According to them the project location map on page 1.2 is incorrect. One of the serious allegations by the localities is that although the mine has not got clearance work has been going on since January 2008. This has serious legal implications, as work in the mine cannot start till it gets the clearance from State Pollution Control Board. The report also states that the area is rocky with scanty vegetation and bushes and there are no perennial water courses/river/water bodies within the lease hold area. However these claims have been strongly opposed by the local people. According to them there is thick vegetation in the core zone area and perennial watercourses within the lease hold area. According to the report 46.8 per cent of total area in buffer zone is forest but the villagers state that this figure is incorrect. The area under forest in the buffer zone is as high as 95 per cent. Further the report states that there are reptiles like Kraits, House lizards, garden lizards and fresh water snakes in the core zone. But the report forgets to mention 'King Cobra' which could be seen in the core zone. The report states that faunal species observed are wild boars, bisons, rabbits, deer, etc. However it forgoes the fact that leopard and tiger can also be seen in the core zone area. The report gives conflicting data. On page no.2.5, the report states that life of the mine is 28 years with planned production of 0.10 million per annum. Whereas on page no 4.15, the report states that life of the mine is expected to be 20 years with production of 0.10 million per annum. According to the localities the distance of the villages mentioned in the report from the mines is also not correct. They are much closer to the mines, therefore will have significant environmental problems. · *High ore to waste ratio:* Page no. 6.3 states that very limited rejection will be generated from this mine. However, table on page no. 2.6 shows that ore to waste ratio will be quite high (1:9.42 to 1:2.21) during the first three years. Therefore, the company needs to have proper waste management programme to minimize disaster due to failure of waste dump. · *No resettlement:* The EIA report states that there is no dwellings with-in the lease area. However, the localities strongly protest this statement and inform that there are houses within the lease area. Therefore, there should be a proper resettlement policy for people living in the lease area. · *Extent of mechanization:* Though the report mentions that there will be no drilling and blasting operation and work will be carried out using manual labour as far as possible, the locals fear that use of rock breakers of small capacity mentioned in the EIA report will take away the jobs from them rather than providing them employment. · *Poor CSR policy:* The EIA report makes big claims on the CSR policy. However they are subjective in nature and cannot be crosschecked in future. The company needs to provide quantitative figures on how it is going to invest on upliftment of villagers in the area through education, health services and other programmes. *(2) Analysis of EIA report of Matheapan E Sataracarachem iron ore mine, Quepem Taluka, South Goa* The Shantilal Khushaldas & Bros. Pvt. Limited owns this mine. It is a small mine with an area of 23 ha in the village Maina in Quepem taluka of South Goa. The EIA report is for mine lease renewal, which was due in November 2007. Some of the critical features of this mine are as follows: · *Cumulative environmental impact:* The Mathepan mines are coming up in an area, which is already surrounded by several other iron ore mines. The Quepem taluka is one of the core area producing iron ore to meet the growing Chinese demand. Therefore, the cumulative impact of all these small iron ore mines will be quite high. Already Quepem taluka of South Goa is facing several protests against iron ore mines. It is therefore advisable that a cumulative environmental impact assessment of all nearby mines is conducted. · At one point in Introduction (pg 1.1), it is said that the mines were granted operational permission in 1953 by the Portuguese Administration, which was later converted to mining lease and were operational till late 70s. But subsequently in project description section (pg 2.4), the report says that the exploration was carried out in 80s. It also says that the leasse is yet to commence the mining operation. It is not clear if this is a renewal of mining lease, which was operational or if this is lease renewal of an area where no mining has been conducted earlier. · In project description (pg 2.3), the report says that mostly rocks with scanty vegetation and bushes cover the area. However, in the biological environment table (pg 3.14 to 3.17), the report talks about a large number of trees (Mango, Gulmohar, Coconut, Sisam, etc) and shrub grasses (Bor, Pitkuli, bomboo, etc) in the core and buffer zone. · The mine is on hilly terrain and Goa receives heavy rainfall due to which sedimentation can be a big problem. The EIA report does not provide any measures to control sedimentation. · The Mine is located just 12 km from Netravali wildlife sanctuary and 11 km from Cotgao wildlife sanctuary. Since, there are a large number of mines in such a small area, the cumulative environmental load is surely going to have some impact on wildlife sanctuary. The EIA report needs to deal with this issue. · The mines will be operated completely manually but it will employ only 135 people out of whom 116 will be semi-skilled and 12 unskilled laborers. It means there will not be sufficient job opportunity for the local people. *(3) Analysis of EIA report of Careamol iron ore mine, Quepem Taluka, South Goa* The iron ore mine is owned by Shri Jaisinh Maganlal. It is a small mine with 98.76 ha in the village Pirla in Quepem Taluka in South Goa. Some of the critical features of this mine are as follows: · EIA report states that the area is a series of low hills and rainfall averages around 3600 mm. Therefore, the area is going face sedimentation problem. This will be severe because they are many mines nearby. But the EIA report does not talk about sedimentation problem. · According to the report, Cotigao sanctuary is 4.6 km from the lease area. Plus, there are other mines also nearby. Thus, the cumulative impact of the mining on the sanctuary is a possibility but again the EIA reports does not talk about any measures to protect the sanctuary. · The EIA report says that backfilling of pit will be subsequently started, but the report as such does not have any reclamation plan or mine closure plan. The company must provide in detail how the reclamation work will be carried out in subsequent years. · The mine is to generate 0.382 million tones of waste every year. However, the executive summary does not explain in detail how the waste will be collected or where it will be dump. The report even does not have any map of project. It only talks about some of the best practice for waste management. · The executive summary does not make any statement on occupational health and safety hazards. Since lease is in low hill areas and with heavy rainfall, there should be a proper occupational health and safety hazard policy. · The executive summary just talks in few lines on CSR policy of the company without making any commitment. The company needs to provide in detail what kinds of CSR policy it intends to take for upliftment of the nearby villagers. *(4) Analysis of EIA report of Devapan Dongor Iron and Manganese Ore Mine, Quepem Taluka, South Goa* Shri Shaikh Salim owns the iron ore and manganese mine. The total reserve is around 5.99 million tones. The mine lease area is 83 ha with an annual production rate of 3.11 lakh tones per annum. It is expected that the mine will produce ore up to 22 years. The land use pattern of mine lease consists of private land and forestland. The report not only contains factual mistakes but also is poor in terms of assessing the significant impacts of the project on environment. In addition to this, the report gives contradictory statements and suggests mitigation measures that seem very superficial. Some of the critical features of this mine are as follows: · In page 1, EIA says that the acquired land for the mines lease is a combination of private and forestland. But no information is available on the land use pattern of mine lease such as, areas under forest, irrigation land, wasteland etc. · In page no. 4, under heading of existing land use pattern in core zone, instead of proving land use pattern, the EIA has mentioned about the lands to be used for mining activities. Interestingly, land use pattern for buffer area is correct. It clearly indicates that the EIA developer is trying to hide the land use pattern in the core zone. · In page 2.2, the report mentions that the lease area has elevated topography and consists of small isolated hillock extending in southwest to southeast direction. It also mentions that the land surrounding the mine lease is agricultural and receives high rainfall (around 3800 mm). If this is the scenario, then impact on land is anticipated to be high. However the EIA fails to quantify the impact on land such as erosion potential of catchments area, erosion potential of waste dumps, and direction of runoff. Based on the topography, it can be anticipated that Cavorem village, which is located at 0.29 km from the mine lease will be the worst affected by air pollution and mine runoff. · The EIA report makes contradictory statement on mining technology. On page no 6, it mentions about the drilling and blasting operation, however in page 2.6, EIA states that no drilling and blasting will be carried out, instead a riper will be used. · EIA report is also incomplete in terms of the number of existing mines and proposed mines in the area. On page 4.14, the EIA states that the villages surrounding the mine lease are dependent on agricultural and mining activities. The huge number of operational mines in the area clearly exhibits the plight of the region in terms of air and water pollution and once the project becomes operational these effects will be enhanced. · EIA is poor in portraying the impact of mining on groundwater and also provides misleading information on the same. On page 2.3 – it states that GW is available at 15 to 25 meter and working depth of a mine is below the water table. On page 4.10, suddenly it says "No occurrence of ground water in the mine lease". In addition to this, the report also fails to provide information on final quarry depth, mine seepage, groundwater flow pattern and impact of draw down. · Mine reclamation is an important issue in mine management and has been poorly represented in the EIA report. On page no 4.11, it mentions "management is committed to reclaim the entire broken area". But the report fails to address the basic information on mine reclamation such as type of reclamation, area to be reclaimed, timeframe and monetary requirement for the same. · Overburden management is a crucial aspect of mine management, but the report fails to provide some basic information on overburden management and most of the mitigation suggested seems very superficial. EIA report is also silent on stripping ratio[5]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftn5>and storage area characteristic for waste such as - slope of land, length of the overburden storage area, runoff direction and erosion potential from the waste dumps. These are some of the significant parameters for the assessment of silt load and its impact on water bodies and on land. The assessment of these parameters is crucial for this project because the mine is located on an elevated area receiving high rainfall and surrounded by sensitive receptors such as human settlement, agricultural land and forest area. · EIA also fails to provide a clear picture on the forest cover in the core zone (i.e. mine lease) and forest area to be diverted for non-forest use. The report also provides contradictory information on the fauna, in page no 3.10 and 3.10 (see animal in core and buffer area) animals listed is different from those mentioned in the page no 4.13 (presence of wild boars, bison, and deer etc). It appears that biodiversity assessment has been poorly done. Moreover, the term of reference given by MOEF clearly states that the biodiversity assessment should be authenticated but no letter of authentication for biodiversity assessment is provided in the report. · Point number ten of the term of reference (given by MOEF) mentions about fund for the maintenance of village road through which transportation of ores is undertaken. The EIA is completely silent on this. *(5) Analysis of EIA report of Chuninimola Iron Ore Mine, Sanguem Taluka, South Goa* The Shantilal Kushaldas & Brother Pvt Limited own the iron ore mine. The total mine reserve is around 2.46 million tones. The lease area of mine is 42.91 ha with an annual production rate of 2.18 lakh tones per annum. It is estimated that the mine will produce ore up to 15 years. The land use pattern of mine lease consists of private land and forestland. This mine is very close to the Devapan Dongor mine. Some of the critical features of this mine are as follows: · Chuninimola Iron ore mine is located in village Rivona in the South Goa district. However, the only difference between the Devapan Dongor and Chuninimola mine is the difference of mine owner. The consultant who prepared the EIA report is same (M/s Bhagavathi Ana labs Ltd, Hyderabad). Topography of both the mine is also almost same except that Chuninimola Iron ore mine is close to Kushavathi river (almost 50 to 60 meter from the mine site), therefore runoff impact is expected to be very high, which is not captured in the EIA. Further, the information on forest cover is conflicting, on page no 31, the forest cover in the study area is given as 40 %, and on page no 40 it is mentioned as 33.6%. · Kalka Nadi which passes close to the mine lease (this river is no where mentioned in the EIA report, see page 3 of 9/1, drainage network in the watershed) will be worst affected by siltation because slope of land is toward SW and river is also flowing in the SW direction. The EIA report chooses to remain completely silent on this. The same consultant has prepared both the EIA reports, and it comes across as a copy-paste job from the Devapan Dongor mine report. · The biggest drawback of the EIA studies of Devapan Dongor and Chuninimola Iron ore mine is that each mine talks about project specific impacts and shows that after mitigation the project will benefit the surrounding areas. Both fail to address the runoff threat, which is very significant bearing in mind the topography of the region, intensity of rainfall and presence of sensitive receptors. Hence siltation impact is critical and requires detailed investigation. ------------------------------ [1]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftnref1> http://www.goaenvis.nic.in/mining.htm, as viewed on 9th September, 2008 [2]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftnref2>Chandra Bhushan et al, 2008, Rich Lands, Poor People: IS sustainable mining possible?, Center for Science & Environment, New Delhi, pp 141 [3]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftnref3> http://english.ohmynews.com/ArticleView/article_view.asp?article_class=3&no=383054&rel_no=1, as viewed on 9th September, 2008 [4]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftnref4>Chandra Bhushan et al, 2008, Rich Lands, Poor People: IS sustainable mining possible?, Center for Science & Environment, New Delhi, pp 145 [5]<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=mjs&ver=L0TusViboKI&am=X_E4pcb3fCGNsZP73g#_ftnref5> The ratio of overburden excavated to the amount of mineral removed is called the *overburden ratio or stripping ratio*. For example a stripping ratio of 4:1 means that 4 tonnes of waste rock are removed to extract one tonne of ore.
