[A] JoeGoaUk quoting a newspaper article thus (excerpted) [1] The Bombay High Court on Friday issued a suo moto show cause notice to Goa government asking why investigation should not be handed over to a specialized agency. The show cause notice .... is returnable by October 27
[2] the court observed : "..... Not only law but even public interest demands that the courts should ensure free, fair and independent investigation of the alleged offence." [B] JoeGoaUk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> then asked: What you say Dr. JC, a close friend of babush? == jc' comment: Dear JoeGoaUk Allow me please, to comment on the above, in the following manner. re # [A]1: I agree entirely with the need for an independent investigation. Then - let the chips fall where they have to fall. re # [B]2: I wonder if the court will take effective 'suo motto' action on those who have caused the revelation of the identity of the victim. I believe that it is illegal to do so. re #[B]: I have not yet had the occasion to meet personally, electronically (or otherwise) with Babush Monseratte. BUT, I would readily be his friend than a friend of some others on GoaNet. Here is one reason. I hope you will find it acceptable. It is better to have as a friend, a 'devil' whose identity is known than a mysterious sniper who hides in the bushes. In other words: Better a babush than the man hiding behind the bush. I trust this answers your query. jc
