--- On Sat, 13/12/08, Samir Kelekar <[email protected]> wrote:
> In my opinion, what she has in mind is this:
> "terrorism has arisen because of frustrations of
> people. In issues
> such as displacement of land as in the Narmada valley,
> govt. is riding
> rough shod over the people. This gives rise to frustrations
> and people
> take to means like terrorism."
Nascy: Is she not right about this Landlord terrorism? Do U mean that displaced
should not be concerned?
>
Samir:
> But in this case, she should be talking about the Narmadas
> in Pakistan
> and not here because the terrorists came from Pakistan.
Nascy:
Why not Narmda from India? The terrorists in Godra and Babri and Orissa and
Mangalore and Bangalore and many more places have come from India and they are
thriving!
Samir:
> When she means justice, I think she means justice for the
> downtrodden.
Nascy:
So what's wrong with that? I think she means also for the downtrodden. Is not
that a 'Good Thing'??
>
Samir:
> But I think this incident, specially the Mumbai attacks,
> doesnt fit her
> argument well. I have a feeling that she first decides on
> the conclusion
> of her article and then uses all her writing skills to
> justify that.
Nascy:
Are Bhai, That is the way; she is pointiog out how all these Terrorism Acts are
some way connected. If there was no Babri, there would have been no follow ups
and retro in India. Terror would have been confined to Kashmir. Of course, in
these troubled times we can never be sure, of anything.
Nascy Caldeira.
Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter now
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/?p1=other&p2=au&p3=tagline
