Thank you Antonio and Dominic for giving us a slice of true history, instead of 
made-up stories which some on Goanet have put forward. So much of our Goan 
history is already lost to us, so many reasons as to why things happened or 
came to be as they did, is now already lost to my generation. I hope all of 
this is preserved in books written by the likes of Antonio and Dominic. One 
other reason why I said poders were "held in high regard" was because in our 
occupation-based caste society, poders were bracketed as chardo. Other 
occupations which might have earned similar wages did not make it, so for some 
reason this was seen almost as a white-collar job.

My only fear is that someone centuries from now will google poders and it will 
spin out the made-up stories of some writers on Goanet. Not only will it give 
us the wrong idea of Goa, it will also tell us all about the penal code of 
Canada, the Presidents of America, the smells of London, written by persons who 
have never left the shores of Goa.

selma


--- On Fri, 2/20/09, Antonio Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Antonio Menezes <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Goanet] Poios, poders & bhatkars
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 12:04 AM
> In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Goan
> catholics were mostly
> farmers, artisans and
> general servicemen. In villages, petty traders were mostly
> Hindu
> possorcars.  However, if there was
> one trading community among catholics it was the poder.
> As Selma (Feb 19 ) has rightly pointed out :*Poders were
> held in high
> regard .........because a lot of
> them managed to make a lucrative earning..
> *Some village traditional stories during the colonial era,
> as told by cabai
> wearing forfathers,  would
> have us believe  that poders who had surplus cash, instead
> of depositing
> with Banco Nacional
> Ultramarino , opted  instead  to pay land taxes that were
> badly needed  by
> the half empty
> government treasury.   In two or three generations these
> lands/paddy fields
> became properties
> of tax payers and poor illiterate farmers who had resided
> and tilled land
> for many generations
> ultimately became  mundkars.  Thus a generation of bhatkars
> was born.
> 
> Antonio


      

Reply via email to