Bella writes:

> I second the excerpts written by Mario Goveia and Nascy Caldeira on 
> this forum.

Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:43:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Samir Kelekar <[email protected]>

Talk from the kinds of Nascy doesnt cost anything, Bella. It doesnt cost
anything sitting in Australia to advice Indians to deal with slums. Nasci
could perhaps show the way by coming to India and walking the talk!

Mario observes:

This notion that Indian expatriates have no business commenting or opining on 
conditions in our homeland cannot be allowed to stand unchallenged.  We have 
just as much right as anyone else who lives in India, especially in a community 
forum like this one, developed precisely to allow us to speak our minds and 
express our opinions.

Every one of us know that we do not face what you face on a daily basis, and 
most of us respect this and stand ready to be constructive and supportive in 
any way we can.  Most of us have seen what works in other countries and wonder 
why some of these attitudes and methods and practices cannot be replicated in 
India.  

However, having said that, isn't waiting around for the government or someone 
else to "walk the talk", part of the problem in India?

We expatriates have solved our own problems our way, making life decisions that 
we felt were in the best interests of ourselves and our families.  Thousands of 
us would probably have never left had it not been for India's disastrous 
50-year experiment with socialism.  I am almost certainly one of them.  Proof 
of this is the recent slowing down of the so-called brain drain, and reversal 
in some cases, even before the current economic slowdown.

Billions of dollars flow from us in aggregate to India, which is precisely why 
the Indian government came up with a unique device to encourage us to continue 
called the Overseas Citizen of India.  Many of us have been instrumental in 
raising the image of India and Indians from the early stereotypes of coexisting 
with snakes and tigers and elephants and monkeys and other Rudyard Kipling 
imagery.

The new Indian stereotype in the west is one of professionals and scientists 
and academics and business people who are second to none in intelligence and 
work ethic, even in the most competitive society the world has ever known, the 
USA, where the old so-called "Protestant work ethic" has long been replaced by 
the "immigrant work ethic".  That is a lot more than just talk.

The fact remains that there are 65 million underutilized Indian slum dwellers, 
highly creative in how they survive, living in the most primitive and degrading 
conditions, often juxtaposed with conspicuous wealth and affluence, especially 
in the urban centers, while people who could do more to employ them and provide 
them with basic social services like Amitabh Bachchan and Aamir Khan, prefer to 
sit around and suck on sour grapes, and others resent the notion that more can 
and must be done by other Indians.





Reply via email to