It features a British boy who is convinced he had a previous life on an island 
called Barra. I've pasted a link for those who want to read up on this boy. 
selma 
--------
Selma,Ian Stevenson at University of Virginia devoted his life to studying such 
cases, and came up empty handed as far as proving the authenticity of the 
claims is concerned. His student Satwant Pasricha continues to investigate 
these anecdotes at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences in 
Bangalore, where I worked for some time. From what I remember, almost all of 
their cases can be explained by mundane factors, such as stories told by 
visitors and playmates. It is virtually impossible to rule out such 
contamination in general.Cheers,Santosh.
------------
Hi Selma,
Let me put you out of your misery.
The Barra boy story is true and Reincarnation is also true, I found no holes in 
it.
As the program said, as we grow up we lose our child memory, secondly they took 
too long to follow up, they had no money, most of all - WHY!

It so happens that as children grow up we loose some of the natures survival 
instincts/gifts that we acquire from nature.
For example psychology (which was discovered long ago by the Greeks but only 
applied as a science till modern times), children are born with it.
As we grow up we lose 'that special gift', dogs and children also have 'that 
special kind of gift', which they cannot convey because they cannot speak.
Be as it may!

19 years ago (long before copy and paste) they showed on TV, made by an 
European Channel, Sweden/Denmark not sure, and repeated several times on Sky 
that year.

An Indian boy born to a poor, I mean very poor slum dwelling woman in an UP 
village.
That woman said he always said to me, 'you are NOT my mum, why do you have only 
one saree, my mum had 100s because I bought them for her, had a car, and a shop.
She said to him 'I am your mum' etc etc - This whole story goes on and on for 
one hour. - To cut it short.
He told her where the shop is, the location of the shop, the tree in front of 
the shop, the safe inside the shop where he kept his money etc etc. 
He told that his wife helped him in the shop, he has two sons, he told them 
their names too.
He told them how the shop counter was positioned (which his wife then changed 
so as not to remind her of her dead husband).
When the boy was taken to that place which was totally in a different area to 
where he was born,that boy or any one would not have known because it was/is 
insignificant.
The tree, the safe, the counter, the positioning of the radios and the TVs etc 
was confirmed by his wife.
The boy told his wife on cmaera, 'you have changed it all'.
The wife when told, 'I am your husband', she told him on camera, "how can I 
call you my husband when you are younger than my sons".
When he told her what he called, she burst into tears and did not want to be in 
front of the camera any more.
The program than moves on to how he died, again, no where near where he was 
born again, and no way any one would have told the boy.
How did he die? he was shot.
When was he shot? on a rainy night in front of his house when in his CAR, 
returning home.
Where was he shot? On the top of the head.
All confirmed by the boy his wife and the villagers. Because it was a heavy 
rainy day there was too much thunder and lightening etc
Why? Money! Black money or whatever.
He says he will not tell where he has hidden it, because it is his.
Now! WHEN THEY SHAVED HIS HEAD ON CAMERA - THERE WAS A BIG SCAR WHERE HE SAID 
HE WAS SHOT.
His biological mother said he was born like that, the doctors said with that 
sort of wound on the head, that place and as a child, he should be dead.
All this on European TV. (professors are 'deliberately' looking in the wrong 
place because they are making a 'living' out of it, longer the search longer 
the pay packet).
ED.



Reply via email to