<P>I think Dr Jose and Mervyn Lobo need to apologise to Marshall for their
unwarranted and false 'tirade' against Marshall. </P>
<P> </P>
<P>First Dr Jose 'reads out of context' and fires off, and takes sides with
Santosh, when he need not interfere; unless he himself has proof of his
allegations, re Marshall's perceived wrong doing! </P>
<P> </P>
<P>And worse off, now he is going 'on leave' from goanet, like our Goa
ministers check into hospitals when they are under threat of imminent arrest,
for something or other.</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Then there is also Mervyn Lobo. who sides with Santosh, not at all
convincingly, without following the debate properly. Mervyn is trying to
exonerate Santosh because of his supposedly past good behaviour,
without taking into consideration his present unwarranted tirade against
Marshall who is rightfully trying to 'expose' the wrong doings of fellow Indian
Countrymen, and their getting away with it, with impunity!!!.<BR></P>
<P>I think an unconditional APOLOGY is now due from Mervyn and Dr Jose for this
particular non characteristic, unwarranted TIRADE against Marshall Mendoza.</P>
<P>And WHY NOT??? Come on Mervyn and Jose: get off your high horse. Will
you??</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Nascy Caldeira</P>
<P>Down Under</P>
<P> </P>
<P>--- On <B>Tue, 10/3/09, Marshall Mendonza
<I><[email protected]></I></B> wrote:<BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT:
rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">
<DIV class=plainMail>I refer to Jose Colaco's message under this
subject.<BR><BR>I am extremely doubtful whether Jose has been following the
debate on this subject, otherwise he would have thought 100 times before
shooting from his keyboard.<BR><BR>Example:<BR>'A' is killed. Initial police
reports indicate that 'B' and/ or his<BR>supporters are behind the
killing. 'B' appears before TV cameras and<BR>assumes responsibility for
the killings and even issues a signed press<BR>statement to this effect. 'A's
supporters have a long enmity with 'C'. 'A's<BR>supporters go on a rampage
killing 'C's family members and relatives and destroying 'C's properties. This
carnage goes on unabated for over 45 days with the active support of 'A's
political godfathers.<BR><BR>Now comes 'X' who says that 'A's supporters
attacked and killed 'C's family members and relatives as retaliation for
'A's murder.<BR><BR>Police investigations are on and no conclusions have
been arrived at so far.<BR>Now the poser to you:<BR></DIV>
<DIV class=plainMail>1.Can 'C' be held responsible for 'A's murder before
completion of police<BR>investigations and filing of charge sheet?<BR>2.Can
'A's supporters inflict violence on 'C' and his family<BR>members/
relatives because they have a long enmity with 'C' and want to<BR>believe that
'C' is behind the crime?<BR>3.Can the violence against "C' by "A's supporters
be considered as<BR>retaliation for 'A's murder?<BR>4.Can the admission of 'B'
that he is responsible for the murder of 'A' be<BR>ignored?<BR>5. Is 'X' right
in holding the view that the attack on "C' is retaliation<BR>for 'A's
murder.<BR><BR>I look forward to your
response.<BR>Regards,<BR>Marshall<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take
a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox
