*Bhaji on the Beach: A Malcontents’ opinion regarding a Protest Party on the
beach*


(publshed in the Gomantak Times 15th April 2009)


There is to be a public protest party on the 19th of April 2009 from 5 pm
onwards. The party will be held on *Vainguinim** **Beach**, a beach that the
invite to this party indicates is a “public beach that the Cidade has been
treating as it's own private property.” The email invitation, that must have
reached a good number of inboxes by the time you read this column, goes on
further to state “You're invited!** *Come help us reclaim the beach. Bring
your friends, family, relatives, dogs, what have you...”



At first glance this invitation struck me as a wonderful example of civil
disobedience, the vanguard movement for the as yet elusive Goan revolution.
The event seems to have all the elements for classic civil disobedience. You
have identified an enemy of the public, who allegedly stands in the way of
the Commonwealth, and you mobilize the public to mount a challenge to this
enemy. The action is a provocation to this public enemy, and it mobilizes
the as yet silent majority to come out and take a stand in favour of the
Commonwealth.



I have to confess that a few weeks ago, I myself would have suggested such
an action, and I would have attended this party at Vainguinim beach. Today
however, I find myself poised differently for reasons that I will now
elaborate.



To begin with, I am extremely uncomfortable with the manner in which Fomento
(the company that owns both Hotel Cidade de Goa and a number of mines) has
been singled out as Public Enemy Number 1. I do not wish to suggest that
Fomento is a lamb bathed in milk; pure and without blemish. I have no doubt
that they are guilty of at the very least making it difficult for people to
access this public beach, that in the course of mining they have engaged in
illegalities and cut corners to make their profits. However, my question to
myself and to those willing to listen is; are they the only violators of the
law in Goa? Clearly not. On the contrary, they are in august company. They
rub shoulders alongside the rest of the industrial houses, and political
dynasties, in Goa which rule the State as if it were their fiefdom. The
casual takeover of public lands through backroom deals, the illegalities in
mining, the exemptions and exceptions, the list of their crimes against the
commonwealth could go on. If this is so, why then, has Fomento suddenly
become public whipping boy? It is this singling out of a single family and
company that bothers me deeply. A few weeks ago, I had questioned the
motives of demonizing Babush Monserrate and suggested that demonizing
Monserrate allows us to ignore the actions of the rest. I fear that in
demonizing Fomento, some similar process is at hand. I must hasten to add
that I do not accuse the organizers of this party of being partisan. I am
merely suggesting that we are unwitting accomplices to larger processes we
have not as yet figured out.



Speaking at a Public meeting against the Ordinance amending the Land
Acquisition Act, I had suggested that we ought to focus on the larger
processes through which the Law in Goa is being subverted. To do so would
move our focus away from the individual violators we are focusing on, the
manifestations of the problem, and train our sights on the root of the
problem. The party at Vainguinim I fear focuses on the manifestation, and
not on the root of the problem. Thus we will go to the party, we will
satisfy ourselves that we have challenged the rot in the system, when in
fact we will have only targeted a single player. The system itself will
continue to flourish.



If not Cidade de Goa and Fomento, who should we target? In my opinion,
target the real entity behind the mess in Goa, the seat of Government. When
the GBA led the first public cries against the Regional Plan, the voices
were loud and clear, give us transparent and accountable governance through
an effective and empowered Panchayat system. This clear and simple demand
was not however responded to. On the contrary we were presented the sham of
a Regional Plan process, which incidentally culminates today. It is through
the demand for transparent and accountable Local self Governance that every
protest movement in Goa today, right from mining to anti-mega housing, is
united. Despite this clarity however, we are yet to see a concerted and
focused protest against the Government. Reclaiming a public beach is good,
challenging illegalities is good and I totally endorse the scheme of such a
public takeover. If only the location were different though. If only we saw
this enthusiasm of takeover outside the Legislative Assembly and
Secretariat. Not a single weekend party, outside the property of a single
player, but a committed siege of the State’s primary offices until we
actually put in place the legal and administrative system that we want. If
the party on Vainguinim beach were the first step towards the radicalization
of the populace, especially the middle class populace that seems to be the
target of this action, I would despite my reservations applaud this
initiative. However, having seen opportunities to challenge the State’s
blatant illegalities and irregularities being squandered, I believe that
this party is a cop-out. It will not continue onward to make the necessary
challenge to the State.



The protest against Cidade de Goa is supposed to be a protest against the
manner in which the public right of way to the beach has been blocked by the
hotel. Who is this public though? Is it the residents of Machado’s Cove,
location of what is playfully (but somewhat aptly) called the Snob Hill
Mansions? Or is it the people of Taleigao, for who the beach was not a space
for leisure but also a space for livelihood generation? Is this party an
attempt to reclaim the beach for livelihood or for leisure? While I see
nothing wrong with reclaiming a public space for leisure, I would like to
see a few more examples of civil disobedience where it is the livelihoods of
people that will be the clear winner of the protest.



Having elaborated my problems with the proposed picnic on the 19th of April,
I would like to conclude by indicating that I do not wish it ill. Any action
that mobilizes the public (and especially the middle class constituent of
the public) to radical action is welcome. I do hope however, that this party
will not be the first and last of such radical actions. I hope it continues,
across locations in Goa, more often than not making a stand for the
livelihoods of people. I have in mind a few locations where we could stand
for the livelihoods of people, and would be more than happy to work with the
organizers of this protest. I’ll be waiting for your call. Until then, Bom
Trabalho e Bom Sucesso.

(Comments are welcomed at www.dervishnotes.blogspot.com)
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------
Read my thoughts at www.dervishnotes.blogspot.com

Reply via email to