Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:04:47 -0400
From: basilio Monteiro <[email protected]>

Today the history of Inquisition is a convenient tool in many hands
with disparate motives. In some hands it serves to keep the Church
forever on the defensive; for others to excuse or justify their
disenchantment with the Church. The devout sons and daughters of the
Church get perplexed, and some defend the Church, unnecessarily, at
all costs, others simply and uncomfortably choose to remain oblivious
of the troubling segment of the past.

Mario observes:

Dear Padre Basilio,

First of all, I commend you for another measured essay written in your 
trademark collegial style.
http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2009-June/179077.html

Regardless of how others try to use the human frailties, atrocities and 
abominations that have cropped up from time to time within the body of the 
Church, like the Crusades, the Inquisition, the excesses prior to the 
Reformation, the caste system in India, the pedophile priests, the abuse of 
nuns in Kerala, the most important issue in my mind is what did Christians do 
in response. 

If Christians played a primary role in exposing, opposing and stopping these 
practices, the subsequent Christians have nothing to be defensive about, in my 
never-humble opinion.  These were aberrations caused by human zealots and 
perverts and supremacists that have nothing to do with the teachings of Christ, 
which is all that I focus on any more almost to the exclusion of all the 
man-made, albeit well meaning, traditions, teachings and practices of 
Christianity.

The Gold Standard which every person of good will, whether Christians or not, 
should be able to agree on from the Christian tradition are the last seven 
Commandments, the Golden Rule and the Sermon on the Mount.  Much of the rest is 
incomprehensible to me as a practical matter and therefore an unnecessary 
distraction from my focus, which is hard enough as it is.

If non-Christians or agnostics bring these awful things from Christianity's 
past up to me, I like my never-defensive response to be, "Yup, that was awful, 
and it was mostly other Christians that confronted and stopped it because that 
was not what Christ was all about."

When I can't say that unequivocally, I have a problem, which is why I have 
publicly criticized Pope John Paul II for being far too late in confronting the 
pedophile priest atrocities, then being far too concerned about the pedophiles 
and their enablers like Cardinal John Law, and not concerned enough about the 
victims, who were scarred for life.

I also excoriated the Cardinal in Kerala who waited to admit the abuse of nuns 
in a book he wrote after retirement instead of confronting and stamping it out 
during all the years he was their leader.  What was he thinking he was doing 
all those years?

It is also why the caste system is the one remaining institutional abomination 
that remains among some Catholics in some parts of India and woe the person who 
defends it or excuses it in my presence.

Basilio wrote:

In general history is written by the victors. Today there many
"victors" and each one of them is trying to re-write history, and of
Inquisition in particular. Unfortunately in the post-modernist times
"wanna-be-historians" are writing history without foundations.

While pseudo-historians will use the history of Inquisition to sow
discontent and disharmony, good historians will continue to work with
the "facts of history" to develop a more wholesome understanding of
this human compulsion to torture, whether it is for interrogatory or
punitive purposes, which will help us to acquire greater and better
self-knowledge.

Mario responds:

If such research leads us to a more factual record, I'm all for it.  If it is 
an attempt to whitewash what happened then I would oppose it.  If 
"understanding" past atrocities helps to avoid repetition, I'm for it.  

However, some human behavior is beyond comprehension, which include some of the 
atrocities I have mentioned above.  Sometimes the details are irrelevent.  For 
example, is it useful to know every detail of how horribly Christians 
mistreated others during the Inquisition?

Some things are simply evil and un-Christian if Christ is the standard, and the 
best we can do is stamp it out and be vigilant to make sure it never recurs.







Reply via email to