--- On Mon, 6/22/09, Mario Goveia <[email protected]> wrote: > > I looked in vain in for any evidence that the Inquisition > had anything to do with Christians being attacked in India > the last couple of years, or to support Gilbert's assertion, > "More Christians likely were killed for their religion in > those episodes (without charges and trial) last year than > individuals killed for their religion in the over 350 years > of Inquisition." >
Perhaps, someone can now start a hate-Hindu blog or website displaying this assertion of Gilbert. Wait a minute! This is what he meant when he asked me to "modulate" the hate-Christian blogs and websites. Now I have got to purchase a powerful modulator-demodulator to do this "modulation". The one my computer has currently might not be good enough for the job. Cheers, Santosh --- On Mon, 6/22/09, Mario Goveia <[email protected]> wrote: > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:03:16 -0700 (PDT) > From: Gilbert Lawrence <[email protected]> > > Some claim the Inquisition is past history for which > current Christians are not responsible. They, need to > browse the web for the hate-Christian web sites. Many of the > anti-Christian riots last year across several states in > India did not occur in a vacuum. More Christians likely were > killed for their religion in those episodes (without charges > and trial) last year than individuals killed for their > religion in the over 350 years of Inquisition. > http://www.cbcisite.com/cbcinews2821.htm > > Mario responds: > > I would like Gilbert to disprove the claim that the > Inquisition is past history for which current Christians are > not responsible. > > I looked in vain in for any evidence that the Inquisition > had anything to do with Christians being attacked in India > the last couple of years, or to support Gilbert's assertion, > "More Christians likely were killed for their religion in > those episodes (without charges and trial) last year than > individuals killed for their religion in the over 350 years > of Inquisition." > > Then I noticed the adjective "likely" and began to realize > that this was just another trademark Gilbert straw > man. Is this is the standard by which the Inquisition > should be discussed, or obfuscated, as we have seen in this > forum? >
