In esponse to this from me: jc2: Sure, provide anecdotal evidence but then "in order to grow" ....test the efficacy and safety by 'scientific' means ....available to ALL scientists.
Fr Ivo wrote: ***"Anecdotal evidence" can come from the patients themselves or from the physicians. ..... "Anecdotal evidence" has to be supported by "scientific evidence", namely by all necessary lab tests, as well as X-ray, ultra-sound, CT scanning, MRI, whatever is needed... === Dear Fr Ivo, I give up. It appears from the above that your concept of testing the efficacy and safety by 'scientific' means ....available to ALL scientists is quite different from what is universally accepted norm for testing i.e. by way of stastistical analysis of raw data - statistical bias having been removed to prevent the skewing of results. And ..... you expect there to be cooperation between Homeopathy and Modern Medicine? BTW: Anecdotally (and as Guiness had once claimed) Paddy the world famous Irishman would swear that a couple of pints of Guiness would do wonders for him and his wife. He would point out to his 10 children - all conceived after consuming 2 pints of that awful brew. On the other hand .... he would point out to his neighbour, Shamus who only drank Heineken. Shamus and his wife had only 7 kids. Anecdotally ....as Paddy would state .... Guiness makes a person 'strong'. OK ..... Thank you Fr Ivo. jc
