DISCOURSE ON HOMOSEXUALITY
                                          By: Bennet Paes, Assolna
 
As long as people copulate, sodomite or masturbate in private, what does it 
matter whether it is legal or not? However, whether it is ethical or not, only 
their conscience can dictate. None others, whether courts of law or religious 
authorities can pass judgments, simply because they don’t know what has been 
going on behind closed doors or behind the camera’s eye.
 
True, homosexuality may have been in practice for centuries and  gone on 
merrily since then. Why then was there so much hype and dancing in the streets 
after the Delhi High Court’s verdict in its favour?  Earlier the gays had 
protested against harassment by the police and by decency-driven public. But 
now it looks like the revelers  have the green card to flaunt their hitherto 
suspect practices in public, under the protection of law. However, the revelers 
may still have to face that ‘hijra’ type contempt in a country where 
discrimination is so rampant, leave alone against colour or creed, unless they 
refrain from taking their new-found euphoria to the market place.
 
A priest  said on a tv channel that the Catholic church, by the very fact that 
it is called catholic, does recognize the freedom of every individual, and thus 
accepts the verdict of the Delhi H.C. allowing gays this freedom. So said a 
Muslim representative, too. However, what they both  vehemently rejected is the 
very act of a sexual relationship between two persons of  the  same sex, 
consenting or not. And by no means this implies that they mean to impose their 
views, as indeed of the views of millions of morality-conscious Indians, on 
these so-called  ‘sexually liberated’ bunch of men and women.
 
From time immemorial institutions and societies of whatever color or creed 
anywhere in the world have by instinct  acknowledged marriage as between a man 
and a woman, i.e. between two persons of opposite  sex. World dictionaries and 
encyclopedias  also define marriage as such.
 
However, if, in the light of Delhi’s H.C’s dubious de-criminalisation verdict 
on homosexuality, gays and lesbians also claim the right to be married, and if 
their human rights need to be recognized under the law, there could still be a 
way out by calling that union  by another name, like “HOMORRIAGE”, for example. 
How about that! After all, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet - even 
to  anti-establishment elements.
 
                                                        ___________________


      Yahoo! India has a new look. Take a sneak peek http://in.yahoo.com/trynew

Reply via email to