http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/oct/27inter.htm

'There is no such thing as Hindu terrorism'
October 27, 2008 16:09 IST

If the Mumbai [ Images ] Anti Terrorist Squad is to be believed, then
the Hindu activists arrested in Indore were responsible for the  bomb
blast at Malegaon in September, which killed six people, to avenge the
various acts of terror carried out in the country.

The operation undertaken by the Mumbai cops has put several Hindu
groups under the scanner. The Maharashtra government has called for a
ban on some Hindu groups which includes the Sanatan Sanstha.

Maharashtra Home Minister R R Patil and Nationalist Congress Party
President Sharad Pawar [ Images ] have sought a ban on the Sanstha,
alleging that the organisation had played a major role in the bomb
blast at Gadkari Rangaytan in Thane in June this year.

Sanatan Sanstha spokeperson Abhay Vartak spoke to rediff.com's Vicky
Nanjappa about the demand for the ban, Hindu terrorism and also their
activities.

Maharashtra Home Minister R R Patil and NCP chief Sharad Pawar have
demanded a ban on the Sanatan Sanstha. What are your views on this?

It is a politically motivated move. The government wants to appease
Muslims and also wants to cover up its non-performance in handling the
law and order situation. Take a look at the violence incited by NCP
activists in Nashik where a Vishwa Hindu Parishad office was attacked.

The Sanatan Sanstha, a non-political spiritual organisation, is an
easy scapegoat. It is surprising that those who are demanding a ban
have not paid any attention to the Sanatan's activities. It has many
public awareness campaigns to its credit over the last 18 years.

Does your outfit encourage Hindu terrorism?

No, we don't encourage terrorism. We denounce the term 'Hindu
terrorism'. Our so-called secular-minded friends declare openly that
terrorists have no religion. We are involved in spreading spiritualism
as per the Sanatan Hindu Dharma. Obviously the philosophy we propagate
is all inclusive and most tolerant.

Your activists are alleged to be involved in the Gadkari Rangaytan
blast in Thane, and the Rabodi riots.

We have nothing to do with both. As far as Gadkari Rangaytan case is
concerned we have already and repeatedly made our position clear by
denouncing the act and helped the police investigate the case. We have
nothing to do with the Rabodi riots, which was a result of Muslim
aggressiveness. It is political propaganda to malign us. We have
demanded proof and are getting legal advice to take action.

Your critics describe you as the Hindu equivalent of the Students
Islamic Movement of India. Are you? What exactly do you do?

We are not. There is hardly any sense in it. We are involved in
spreading national feelings, dreaming of an India which will show the
path of peace to the world. Compare this with what SIMI [ Images ]
aims to do. We are a Hindutvawadi spiritual organisation working in
society for its spiritual upliftment. And as the spiritual truths
explained by Sanatan Hindu Dharma is all inclusive, there are many
non-Hindus who are doing spiritual practice as per the Sanatan's
guidance. I think this much shall be sufficient to stop comparing SIMI
with us once and for all.

There has been a lot of focus on terrorism allegedly executed by
Muslims, but your organisation is said to be in the forefront of
encouraging Hindu terrorism. Do you believe in tit for tat?

The whole statement needs a closer look. If you take terrorism as a
problem faced by this country then it is wrong to say there is a lot
of focus on terrorism. Actually, there is comparatively less focus on
terrorism as compared to the magnitude of the actual problem.

There is nothing called 'Hindu terrorism'. Actually our secular
friends say that terrorism is terrorism and it shall not be labeled as
'Muslim terrorism'. We believe in firm, impartial handling of
terrorism cases by the government. But the government and its
political allies are not interested in doing so. The neglect of Hindu
genocide in Kashmir [ Images ] and Afzal Guru's case are worth noting.
Despite Hindu genocide in Kashmir there is no tit for tat feeling or
counter-terrorist attacks by Hindus and this clearly shows that there
is no such thing as Hindu terrorism here.

Critics say the authorities are soft on Hindu terrorism, cracking down
only on Muslim terrorism. Isn't it true? How else will you explain
away the inaction in the Nanded blasts, the Kanpur blasts?

There is no such a thing as Hindu terrorism so how can the government
act against something which doesn't exist?

There is a Congress government in Maharashtra and this party never is
and was Hindutvawadi. In Uttar Pradesh [ Images ], Mayawati [ Images ]
is in power. Better ask them this question. In Maharashtra, the police
officers who have honestly worked and controlled the riots at Rabodi
are facing punishment in the form of transfer and suspension. It is
communalising of the police force. The media seems to have overlooked
this angle.

Who do you think planted the bombs at Malegaon and Modasa?

The government agencies are there to investigate. We are not
interested in wild speculation.

There have been several appeals made by the Shiv Sena [ Images ] and
the Ram Sena in Karnataka to fight terror with an eye for an eye
approach. Does the Sanatan Sanstha support this?

To the best of my knowledge, they are seeking resistance to the
aggression against Hindus. Now how terror needs to be fought with the
government agencies failing, needs debate.

Do you think the only way to fight terrorism is by terrorism?

Terrorism [ Images ] as understood generally is a physical phenomenon.
But we understand a physical phenomenon doesn't appear from nowhere.
Behind any physical action there is a thought. And thought is based on
beliefs and perceptions. Similarly, terrorism as a physical phenomenon
is the result of ideology. An ideology is a product of faith,
perceptions etc. The intellectual expression which gives rise to
physical acts of terrorism needs to be countered also.

Not only this but any intellectual expression is a manifestation of a
spiritual phenomenon. That also needs to be countered. We believe that
better attention should be paid to these dimensions if we are
considering ways to counter terrorism.

What is your take on the recent anti-Christian violence unleashed by
Hindu organisations? Don't you think such violence shames Hindus, a
majority of whom do not share this violent ideology?

No one will support violence on innocents. The violence occurring in
Orissa is a reaction to the killing of Swami Lakshmananada and his
associates. The reaction is of the common people. Yes a majority of
Hindus do not share violent ideology but the majority also don't want
conversions by force and allurement, genocide of their brethren in
Kashmir, appeasement of Muslims by instruments like the Sachar report
and its implementation, denigration of their deities -- the list of
such aggression is endless. So if one wants to curb such a physical
reaction to violence then one should be willing to address the issues
of aggression of various kinds that produce the reaction.

Hinduism today is rife with so many negatives. Caste has become more
and more institutionalised, ill-treatment of women is still going on,
illiteracy is another bane, and the tribals live beyond the pale of
civilisation. Shouldn't organisations such as yours function as social
reformers, remove the negatives from the religion? What are you doing
in this regard?

Before we make a list of what is bad in Hinduism, one should make an
attempt to see what is good in Hinduism as well. Many things you have
enlisted appear as small things blown out of proportion in this
context. The issues you mentioned better be discussed individually and
separately rather than branding Hinduism as a cause for what you have
enlisted in general.

Whatever it is we are actively involved in dharmashikshan (educating
people about Hinduism). It is this aspect which has been seriously
neglected for various reasons and is an important cause of many of the
problems faced by Hinduism today. Apart from this we are active in
curbing malpractices in public celebrations like Ganeshostav, moral
value education, educating people about stress-free life through
spiritual practice. We as an organisation treat all castes and sexes
as equal.

There were some photographs being circulated on the internet regarding
terror training camps sponsored by the Bajrang Dal. What are your
views on this?

We have not come across such a thing. If indeed such is the case then
it will be a good question to ask the government authorities.

If the Union government decides to ban the Sanatan Sanstha what will you do?

We will fight the ban in a court of law and on public platforms, apart
from praying to God to give some sense to the Union government.

Reply via email to