Can an advocate instructed by a party to act or appear in a matter do so 
without filing a "Vakalatnama" ?   This is an issue which affects several 
litigants in recent times in the State of Goa.

It is learnt that the law prescribes that and advocate   may file a statement 
signed by his/her  client stating that he/she  has instructions from or on 
behalf of his/her  client to act or appear in the matter but  also undertaking 
to file within a week a "Vakalatnama" in the prescribed form, duly signed by 
the party.

However, there is a gross violation by Advocates to the extent that sometime 
"Vakalatnama" is never filed even after the case progresses beyond the evidence 
stage .

In a recent case this writer observed that an Advocate cum Notary  Mr Fotto 
Bhangui from Margao Salcete, Goa  appearing on behalf of a real estate 
developer in a matter before the Chief Officer of Margao Municipality had 
niether filed a statement by his client that he has instructions from or on 
behalf of his client to act or appear in the matter on the date fixed for 
arguments,  nor did he comply with the undertaking to file within a week a 
Vakalatnama in the prescribed form, duly signed by the party, instead he 
appeared "de novo" at the next hearing without complying with the same.

When brought to his notice by this writer publicly that the same constitutes 
violation of  professional ethics and conduct of  a legal officer of the Court 
more so being in the profession for nearly thirty years and a notary public he 
tried to wriggle out of the situation overlooking the lapse in full public gaze.

However this gross lapse which the Advocate failed to comply   was recorded in 
the days proceedings and the matter will now be pursued before the Bar Council 
of Maharashtra and Goa for penal action against the Advocate and to act as a 
deterrent for other Advocates who commit such breach of legal procedures.

Meanwhile some persons in the Margao Municipality brought to the notice of this 
writer discreetly that this lapse is almost rampant even in the civil courts . 
However they fear reprisal from the erring advocates and therefore are 
reluctant to go on record.

It is hoped that the learned judges of the Courts and quasi judicial officers 
in the Executive arm of the Government takes cognizance of such lapses and 
issues direction to the Registrars to ensure that Advocates cease and desist 
from such lapses and pull up suo moto erring Advocates.

GODFREY J. I. GONSALVES,
BORDA, MARGAO, 403 602, GOA. (INDIA)
+91 98221 58584 (24 HRS) 
[email protected]




      The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. 
http://in.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to