Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:13:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: Xanno Moidecar <[email protected]>

I look at my lovely family and I know that if any one of them needed it, I 
would have absolutely no hesitation in taking recourse to any means whatsoever, 
to secure their wellbeing.

Mario observes:

>From what I have read, securing the well being of your family members through 
>embryonic stem cell research is hardly imminent.  Besides, embryonic stem 
>cells are available through other means like umbilical cord blood.  If I am 
>wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me.

However, the dilemma about what to do about the growing number of unused 
embryos does not seem to have any logical solution for those of us who know 
that the human life begins at conception.

Xanno writes:

I feel the solution suggested by you and Mario may be the best in these 
circumstances.

Mario responds:

Based on his comments, we can see that Mervyn is against abortions.

However, Mervyn seems to have accepted the sophistry by some medical 
professionals he has questioned that the ONLY alternative to abortion is some 
old lady hanging around a back alley with a coat-hanger waiting to conduct 
abortions on demand.  I believe, if you probe a little deeper you would find 
that these particular medical professionals have some vested interest in 
performing abortions.  I say this based on the bogus alternative they have 
mentioned, instead of the far more logical alternatives of counseling and 
adoption by one of the numerous Catholic or Protestant organizations who will 
help a woman who finds herself in these trying and traumatic circumstances.

If there are no such organizations in Canada, there are several in the US, 
where Canadians who want to prolong their lives already know they can come for 
immediate medical tests and procedures that have long waiting lists in Canada.

Mervyn counsels against watching videos of abortions, the most effective way to 
show someone who thinks the fetus is a tissue mass that they are tearing an 
actual human being limb from limb.  I saw a Director of Planned Parenthood in 
the US interviewed on TV recently after she left Planned Parenthood to speak 
out against abortions on demand, and her epiphany was as a result of watching 
an ultrasound of an abortion being performed.

The view that abortion is not murder comes from the scientists and secular and 
legal systems defining a time frame prior to which a fetus is not considered by 
them to be a human being.  Legally, abortion is not murder at least in the 
early stages in most civilized countries, but in many places until it is born 
alive.

Mervyn agrees that many abortions can be prevented if the young woman is helped 
financially.  However, he seems to imply that it is the government that should 
be doing so when he says, "However, most tax payers baulk at the idea when the 
realize that they will have to pay more taxes."  This may be the prevailing 
view in socialist-oriented Canada, but in the US the organizations that help 
women avoid abortion are private and religious organizations, using funds 
donated by private individuals.

In Canada Mother Theresa's Missionaries used to have a facility in Toronto but 
had to close it because of a lack of private donations.  They do have several 
facilities in the US, and along with Catholic Charities should be the first 
stop for a woman with an unwanted pregnancy.















Reply via email to