Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:10:23 +0400 From: Arwin Mesquita <[email protected]>
Mario; Again as I have said "capitalism cannot be allowed an in-discriminate spree; to affect the land & local populace negatively" I have stated that its has to be controlled and not given a complete Freed Hand; Mario responds: I know what you have stated - no need to repeat it. My question is "who gets to decide" what affects someone else negatively. Who exactly will do the controlling, and based on whose rules? Arwin writes: Total Capitalism has serious negative implications for State and Society!! It is a well known fact that capitalism cannot be allowed an in-discriminate spree; to affect the land & local populace negatively. Mario responds: Not at all. The well know fact is just the opposite. The proof is that the countries at the capitalist end of the spectrum are far better off economically and socially that those at the other end of the spectrum. Why do you think the magnets for the world's downtrodden are, by rank, 1. USA, 2. Australia, 3. NZ, 4. Canada, 5. Blighty. Capitalist Singapore and Hongkong would rank ahead of the USA in my opinion if they were not so small and oppressive politically.
