The concept of Public Interest Litigations (PILs) has over the last two
decades, grown and expanded to cover all types of litigation involving the
interests of the general public.

The Supreme Court has recently directed each High Court to frame its own
rules on Public Interest Litigations. Would it not have been better for the
Supreme Court itself to formulate the rules so that the same could be
uniformly enforced by every High Court across the country? This would ensure
some consistency in the manner in which our judges address PILs.

It would be nice to see our courts being more proactive and taking suo motu
cognizance of public views. This would, in a way, help to ensure a PIL does
not end up as a Private Interest Litigation, Political Interest Litigation,
Publicity Interest Litigation or worse still, a Paisa Interest Litigation.

Aires Rodrigues
Ribandar

Reply via email to