JC, you are correct. I misspelt statute. I hear what you say and agree that the reading of news particularly involves looking things up, as finding the paper delivered by the CJ, etc. The translation of specific information, and its presentation into a news item often leaves much to be desired.
I have nothing to add, and I was not referring to abortions. Also, as an aside---my response on this topic does not mean I validate the word "repugnant" in the subject headline. The same is true when I respond to other Subject topics. venantius
