Sandeep article on M F Hussain is a height of hypocrisy. While Sandeep calls the saga of Hussain a cruel reflection of our times and our society’s growing Intolerance." Sandeep has no comment on what Hussain's obligation to his own religion is.
Sandeep calls opposition to Hussain's painting as a sign of barbarism, however, he has no hassle in justifying the barbarism in say Islam where he casually attributes it to the fact that it is part of the Muslim religion, or it is part of their tradition. Any thinking person -- be it Sandeep or Hussain or Marshall --- ought to ask the fundamental question --- if I can do such paintings of the Hindu Gods or Goddesses, why cant I do it in my own religion ? And if I can't do it, what is the reason ? Can one justify the barbaric status of one religion saying it is tradition, while at the same time talk about "freedom of speech" when another religion is concerned ? These double standards are very obvious to any neutral observer. One needs to see how these so called defenders of "secularism" go running with their tail between their legs when Tasleema Nasreen is attacked by the Muslims. For heaven's sake, dont call yourself secular at least. You are disgracing that good word. Freedom of expression is not a right that applies only selectively or as per convenience. There is a limit to how much of a tunnel vision one can have. Yes, the protestors are taking Hinduism to "dark ages"; if succesful, Hinduism will then become like Islam which is still in the dark ages, and then presumably Sandeep and Marshall will have no problems with it! regards, Samir