Gabe Menezes <[email protected]> wrote thus to O.C (which somehow may be =Oscar Rebello) :
QUESTION: To the good Doc (OC) ....Does he believe that a whole tube or Ratol was consumed? The data available, suggests, if this was the case she would have been gone within 36 hours! May be our resident Doc from the Bahamas could give us his his opinion on the vast knowledge he has acquired, both as a physician and as a Law Grad === jc Response: 1: Is Gabe asking me for an opinion on what Oscar Rebello believes? or 2: Is he asking me if I believe that ' a whole tube was consumed.?. 3: I have no way of knowing what another person truly believes. 4: Also, I am not a toxicologist - so I have no opinion on the pharmacodynamics of Ratol. If I produce an opinion, it will be based on information that is available to everyone else. 5: BTW: What has anyone's knowledge of law got to do with this question? == Gabe also wrote thus to OC (? Oscar Rebello) Question: Now the good doctor has ascertained that this was a suicide, he has already passed judgment. jc 6: Where is the question? jc 7: Here is a 'judgment' by the esteemed Aires Rodrigues (10 days earlier) [ http://www.digitalgoa.com/ca_disp.php?id=1196 Adv. Rodrigues has stated that the cause that led Nadia to suicide needs to be probed along with her relationship with Micky Pacheco.] == jc Concluding comment: Is it not proper to WAIT and allow for all the chips to fall where they fall? At this moment, I am more interested in the 'actions' or 'non-actions' of the doctors who saw the patient. For, if they noted the alleged injuries and did not report them to the police -They need to be dealt with. If they did not recognise the alleged injuries, they need to close down shop. jc
