On 22 June 2010 12:44, J. Colaco < jc> <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is indeed the procedure normally followed by AGMs > > Was it followed this time around? > > If it was ....fine > > It it wasn't .....that alleged AGM and its decisions are 'out of the > window' > > jc > "Low-Risk" officer of the court of public opinion (:-) > > RESPONSE: I am drawing inference here; please correct me if I am wrong. Is it being implied that the meeting took place without having a quorum? If so the meeting would be deemed null and void. Also in response to Marshall, yes you are correct, the brain went ahead of the fingers! -- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.
