> "Thank goodness JoeGoaUk or Rajan Parrikar isn't around," the > Goanetter said, as he re-zipped his fly!
Goodness gracious, how wrong could we (the unnamed Goanetter and me) be! Rajan Parrikar *is* very much around in Goa currently, and he even showed up searching for Soter last evening at Cafe Prakash! Even if only to make a point. All you guys who disregard concepts like Sulabh Souchalayas, please be warned. As for JoeGoaUk, Rajan told me bluntly and confidantly: "You know who JoeGoaUk is!" On 30 June 2010 23:59, augusto pinto <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Did you not have no shame to witness the exposure of the said > goanetter to the elements, and for all we know, to a full ferry-load > of people from Chorao, thereby offending their delicate sensibilities? We were going over to the Pomburpa (not Chorao) end, it was late, the crowd sparse and the ferry hadn't arrived yet. So the issue raised by you did not arise. > 2) Could you not have effected a 'citizen's arrest' and nabbed the > culprit and brought him (I presume it was a him, as I believe that the > hers in Goa have not yet reached that stage of degeneration whereby > they do no.1 and no.2 in full view of a full ferry-load of people) to > book at a police station? Couldn't you have told me this a day earlier? > 3) If you were too frightened to effect a 'citizen's arrest' could you > not at least have led the said offender to the nearest rest-room where > he (I presume it was a him) could have relieved himself without > offending against the law? The nearest "rest room" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rest_room] was a river away! There are no houses alongside the Chorao ferry point, as you would perhaps be well aware, and at Pomburpa side has has only private homes. I don't know about the infra-red capabilities of the cameras of the two gentlemen mentioned above, but it would be worth a risk if push came to shove. Who wants to risk getting caught on Goanet, or, worse still, on a local daily? As I conveniently advocate: "Be good, if you can't, don't get caught." > 4) Do you not feel any shame in encouraging this sort of activity from > a goanetter, a Goan goanetter I presume, and not a ghatti one like > Vhidyadhar Ghadgil, and thus encouraging actual ghattis to perform > even worse desecrations upon the soil of Goa, our beautiful golden > Goa? Just to set the record straight, V[h]idyadhar G[h]adgil is not a run of the mill ghatti, educated as he is in a "very decent" school across the ghats, in Pune. Of pure Jesuit vintage. (Frankly, I was shocked if not scandalised to learn that we shared the same principals!) As is anti-ghatti Rajan Parrikar, though of Salesian vintage from Panjim. And while on the topic, do you suspect there is some Jesuit-Salesian ideological bias that results in the Left-Right dichotomy we now see in cyberspace? If this were true, it would be strange, turning a full circle (even if unintentional) for those who once spearheaded the Counter-Reformation at least. > 5) Do you not feel that you owe an APOLOGY to all Goans for such > pro-ghatti activity as allowing goanetters to unzip their flies in > full view of nubile Goan virgins? Now that you have raised so many (irrelevant) questions, I do feel somewhat guilty. Nonetheless, I hope my (evasive) questions have somewhat satisfied you! FN > Kindly answer my questions immediately, or else I expect you, Admin > Noronha, to forthwith submit your resignation from the moderatorship > of goanet.
