On 4 July 2010 04:26, Aires Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote:
> In keeping with judicial propriety any judge who may be unable to decide > impartially a case brought before him, declines to hear the matter and > recuses himself. This is very appropriate as justice needs not only to have > been done but to be seen to have been done. However, it is desirable that > every judge when he says “Not before me” also gives the clear reason why he > is recusing himself from the case. This would leave no room for public > speculation on the issue and the rumour mill running amok. The Judiciary > needs to be more transparent and accountable. The proposed Judicial > Standards and Accountability Bill may be a step in the right direction. > > Aires Rodrigues > T1 - B30, Ribandar Retreat > Ribandar - Goa - 403006 > Mobile: 9822684372 > COMMENT: May I also add, not only with the Judiciary but also in every situation wherein there is a conflict of interest. We have a pied piper who runs a Goan organization, who sees no conflict of interest because he thinks is a holy man! What God hath joined together let no man put asunder does not apply. -- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.
