To Goanet - This is what Admin Noronha and his Marxist cohorts do not want you to read.
As I have written before, the Internet came along and busted these dirtbags. And today even the courts call out their chicanery. In Goa we had the - what was it, the "broken piss report" peddled by Comrade Gadgil until Dr. Anand Virgincar busted him. http://publication.samachar.com/pub_article.php?id=10358119&nextids=10358116|10358117|10357417|10358118|10358119&nextIndex=0 "The role played by "independent experts" — historians and archaeologists who appeared on behalf of the Waqf Board to support its claim — has come in for criticism by one of the Allahabad High Court judges in the Ayodhya verdict. While the special bench of three judges unanimously dismissed objections raised by the experts to the presence of a temple, it was Justice Sudhir Agarwal who put their claims to extended judicial scrutiny. Most of these experts deposed twice. Before the ASI excavations, they said there was no temple beneath the mosque and, after the site had been dug up, they claimed what was unearthed was a mosque or a stupa. During lengthy cross-examination spread over several pages and recorded by Justice Agarwal, the historians and experts were subjected to pointed queries about their expertise, background and basis for their opinions. To the court's astonishment, some who had written signed articles and issued pamphlets, found themselves withering under scrutiny and the judge said they were displaying an "ostrich-like attitude" to facts. He also pointed out how the independent witnesses were all connected — one had done a PhD under the other, another had contributed an article to a book penned by a witness..." Also see this - http://arunsmusings.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-judge-wrote.html Regards, r
