I would like to comment on inaccurate statements made in the article provided below, as they pertain to something being scientific or unscientific. I have no interest in discussing the author's religious beliefs. He like everybody else is entitled to practice his own religion. But to misrepresent science in order to promote one's own parochial religious beliefs is wrong. In the present case the author named Mani Bhaumik is trying to promote his Hindu beliefs while refuting the beliefs of Christianity, and calling it being scientific. Please see the following statement:
QUOTE An impartial appraisal of the warp and weft of physical reality reveals that woven throughout the universe is an abstract intelligence that is akin to a Creator and Sustainer, in the sense meant by Brahmn in Indic thought. This is not an anthropomorphic God who rages and rules and demands obeisance. The perception of the elegant order of the universe and its existence as a single significant whole, which Einstein called the "cosmic religious feeling", is devoid of a god conceived in man's image. UNQUOTE .....Mani Bhaumik The truth is the above claim is unscientific and bogus from an objective factual standpoint. Science has nothing to do with the supernatural. It has nothing to say about the question of God, one way or the other. It does not support or refute anybody's religious beliefs. Cheers, Santosh --- On Sun, 11/21/10, Marshall Mendonza <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://m.timesofindia.com/PDATOI/articleshow/6942693.cms >
