Anecdotal (rare) examples is not proof positive. Recently reading some historical writings about Goa, I can across two topics; whose conclusions may represents a pattern.
One was a photograph of a circular building which at first is attributed as POSSIBLY being a Jewish synagogue. Soon the conclusion is made that the photograph was proof of an active Jewish community in Goa. Another example was a Syrian Orthodox Cross found at Aggasain, reportedly at the bottom of the river. This artifact is reportedly displayed at the museum in Pillar. This was claimed to be proof of an active Christian community in Goa; prior to the Portuguese. Does a solitary artifact prove the existence of a whole community? Should there not exists lot more artifacts if such a community existed? In the case of the Syrian Orthodox Cross, this object could well be on its way to its final destination with Goa's famous port being the entry or exit harbor. Anecdotal cases make interesting reading, but are generally an exception rather than rule. Because of their exception, the anecdotal observations make interesting reporting and reading. Regards, GL
