--- On Sat, 12/11/10, Carvalho <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>Santosh,
>It appears I am not a woman of my word. I said you could
> have the last one and I take that back. First off, I haven't attacked >you, I 
> have merely pointed out a reality as I see it - realities maybe >distorted. 
> That your particular biases are very obvious in any discussion >and your 
> claims to neutrality wear thin. And please spare us the >histrionics of how 
> you are being attacked by everyone and how boorish >goanet is as a forum.
>  

Selma,

Again, I have no idea why you are attacking me for merely pointing out that 
respected Western outlets are equal opportunity critics of Christianity, 
Hinduism and Islam. I have backed my statements with facts on this front. It is 
clear that you don't have the courtesy to admit you are wrong. Instead, you are 
trying to falsely associate me with some guy called Malhotra, about whom or 
whose article I have said nothing in support. Indeed, I have stated my 
disagreement with his claim of mutual respect. Admittedly, I do not have your 
talent for hyperbole in stating my disagreement. 

Regarding neutrality, I have never claimed to be neutral when it comes to 
factual evidence, science and rational non-hyperbolic discourse. I am firmly on 
their side. I also have a bias in favor of India and the United States of 
America. Please feel free to exercise your biases against Malhotra or anybody 
else. You have my full support. But please leave me out of your tirades.

Cheers,

Santosh



Reply via email to